SPN engineers scanning rebar location and concrete cover on a factory concrete floor on site
Rebar scanning on a concrete floor is the first step in assessing floor load capacity when no construction drawings or original calculations are available to check.

What Live Load Does Thai Law Require for Floors?

The law sets the minimum live load for industrial factory and warehouse floors at 500 kg/m². Live load is the weight of people, goods and movable machinery that the floor must carry, in addition to the self-weight of the structure itself.

The Ministerial Regulation on Structural Design of Buildings and the Characteristics and Properties of Materials Used in Building Structures B.E. 2566 (2023) sets the minimum design values by type of floor use. It repeals Ministerial Regulation No. 6 (B.E. 2527 / 1984), which had long been the usual reference.

← Scroll to see the full table →

Type of floor useMinimum live load (kg/m²)
Industrial factory areas500
Storage areas / warehouses500
Commercial buildings, wholesale areas500
Commercial buildings, retail areas400
Offices (general work areas)250
Offices — document and parcel storage rooms500
Library stack rooms600
Connecting walkways between buildings500
Parking for passenger cars (up to 7 seats) and motorcycles300
Parking for empty trucks and other buses800
Residential houses200

Source: Ministerial Regulation on structural design of buildings B.E. 2566 (2023), Clause 11 (Royal Thai Government Gazette, Vol. 140, Part 54 Kor, 6 September 2023; in force from 5 March 2024). The table above lists only the items relevant to factory and warehouse buildings; see the full regulation text for complete details. For a summary of the key points, read 2023 Foundation Ministerial Regulation: An Easy-to-Understand Summary

⚠️ The values in the table are the “minimum the design must achieve”, not “what this particular floor can actually carry”

The figures in the Ministerial Regulation forbid designers from designing below them, but they do not guarantee that every completed building can carry that load. That depends on whether it was built to the drawings, whether the materials reached their specified strength, and how the building has been used or modified since.

Can the Live Load Ever Be Reduced?

Yes for ordinary buildings, but not for factories and warehouses. The 2023 Ministerial Regulation allows the live load to be reduced by set proportions when designing the columns and foundations of multi-story buildings, because it is unlikely that every floor will be fully loaded at the same time. The reduction starts from the third floor below the roof and increases with the number of floors further down.

The key exception: the Ministerial Regulation prohibits live-load reduction for warehouse and industrial factory areas, as well as for any area with a live load greater than 500 kilograms per square meter. The reason is that these buildings really can be fully loaded on every floor at the same time.

There are also impact requirements that must be added on top of the live load, which are often overlooked when a new tenant moves in and installs machinery.

  • Light machinery: add 20 percent
  • Reciprocating machinery or power-generating units: add 50 percent
  • Hoists or elevators: add 100 percent

Uniformly Distributed Load vs Point Load: What’s the Difference?

A uniformly distributed load is spread evenly over the whole floor, while a point load presses down on a small contact area, so a floor that passes the first criterion may fail the second. This is the most common misunderstanding. The 500 kg/m² value is a uniformly distributed load (UDL), but in a real warehouse, racking and forklifts transfer load to the floor as point loads through rack base plates or wheel contact patches only a few square centimeters in area.

A uniformly distributed load of 500 kg/m² compared with point loads from rack legs and forklift wheels, which require a punching shear check of the floor The left image shows a concrete floor supported on beams and columns, with pallets spread across the floor. A uniformly distributed load of 500 kg/m² is the minimum set by the Ministerial Regulation for storage, warehouse and factory areas; it is used to design the whole slab and its supporting beams, and suits goods spread across the area. The right image shows selective racking carrying several levels of pallets, transferring load to the floor as point loads through base plates of about 15 by 15 centimeters, several tonnes per leg, and a forklift whose wheels impose repeated moving loads with impact. The enlarged detail below shows the punching shear perimeter around a base plate through the slab thickness. The strip at the bottom summarizes four checks: punching shear, rack leg position relative to columns and beams, forklift travel paths, and floor flatness. UDL vs point load: kg/m² alone is not enough Not to scale Uniform load (UDL) w = 500 kg/m² over whole floor Min. per 2023 Regulation Warehouse / factory · whole-slab design Suits goods spread over the area = design minimum, not actual capacity Point load Rack legs: tonnes per leg Via base plate ~15×15 cm Wheel: cyclic+impact Punching line (punching shear) Around base plate 1 Punching Shear Around base plate 2 Leg position Midspan vs near column 3 Forklift path Repeated + impact 4 Floor flatness Racks tilt, uneven load
A floor that passes 500 kg/m² as a uniformly distributed load may still be unsafe when the same load is transferred as point loads through rack legs.

For example, selective racking fully loaded with pallets may put several tonnes on each upright through a base plate of about 15 × 15 centimeters. The bearing pressure at that spot is therefore many times higher than the floor-wide average, so there are 4 more issues to check beyond the kg/m² figure:

  • Punching shear — the slab is punched through locally around the base plate
  • Rack leg position relative to columns and beams — legs at midspan are riskier than legs near column lines
  • Forklift travel paths — repeated moving loads with added impact
  • Floor flatness — an uneven floor makes tall racks lean and transfer load unevenly

Slab on Ground vs Pile-Supported Slab: How Does the Assessment Differ?

A slab on ground is assessed through its subgrade, while a slab that carries load to beams and piles is assessed through the strength of the slab, beams and piles. So before assessing load capacity you must first know which system the floor is, because the load-carrying mechanisms differ.

← Scroll to see the full table →

IssueSlab on groundSlab on beams and piles (suspended slab)
Where the load goesDirectly into the soil beneath the slabBeams, columns and piles
Main controlling factorCompaction quality and bearing capacity of the subgradeStrength of slab and beams, and pile bearing capacity
Key riskSettlement and slab cracking in soft-clay or newly filled areasSlab deflection, shear cracking, punching around column heads
Inspection methods usedPlate Bearing Test (ASTM D1195/D1196), Field Density Test, soil investigationRebar Scan, GPR (ASTM D6432), Core Test (ASTM C42/C39), Floor Load Test
Additional data to requestFill and compaction reports, previous soil test resultsAs-built drawings, calculations, pile test results

In the soft-clay areas of Bangkok and its vicinity, slabs on ground that do not transfer load to piles usually settle more than the pile-supported building itself, causing gaps between the slab and columns and voids under the slab over time. This is explained in detail in How to Fix Settling Fill Ground

The two images below summarize the content above. The first is a 2D section comparing the two floor systems — load paths, key risks and the inspection methods used. The second is a 3D model of a warehouse floor showing the critical points and inspection locations.

2D model (section) comparing a slab on ground with a slab that transfers load to beams and piles: load paths, key risks and inspection methods The left panel shows a slab on ground, with rack legs and forklift wheels pressing on the floor. Load passes through the slab directly into the compacted fill and soft clay, while the building columns sit on piles, so the slab settles more than the columns, creating a gap between slab and columns and a void beneath the slab. Inspection methods are the Plate Bearing Test per ASTM D1195 and D1196, field density testing and soil investigation. The right panel shows a slab that transfers load to beams, columns and piles. Load from rack legs at midspan makes the slab deflect, and the area around column heads is at risk of punching shear. Inspection methods are GPR rebar scanning per ASTM D6432, coring per ASTM C42 and C39, and a Floor Load Test. The bottom row shows the three ways to prove load capacity: reviewing existing documents, non-destructive on-site inspection, and actual load testing, which gives the most direct evidence. Two slab systems, two mechanisms (2D) Not to scale Slab on ground Load goes straight to subgrade Compacted fill Soft clay Load path: rack leg → slab → soil Slab–column gap Slab settles more than piled columns Void under slab Controls: compaction + subgrade strength • Plate Bearing Test (ASTM D1195/D1196) • Field Density Test • Soil boring · get fill/compaction report Slab on beams & piles (suspended) Load: slab → beam → column → pile Load path: slab → beam → column → pile Midspan deflection Midspan legs riskier Punching at column heads Controls: slab, beam & pile strength • Rebar Scan + GPR (ASTM D6432) • Core Test (ASTM C42/C39) • Floor Load Test · get as-built 3 ways to prove existing slab capacity (combined) 1 Review existing documents Know the design values Not yet proof it was built to plan 2 Non-destructive site inspection Scan · GPR · UPV · Core Enough data for engineer to recalc 3 Floor Load Test Real load · deflection/recovery Most direct evidence at test point
2D model (section) — a slab on ground transfers load directly to the subgrade, so in soft soil it settles more than columns on piles, causing gaps and voids under the slab. A slab carried by beams and piles is at risk of midspan deflection and punching shear around column heads. The bottom row shows the three complementary ways to prove capacity (Image: SPN Soil Engineering)
3D model of a warehouse floor about to change use, the critical points to inspect, and the five-step sequence before installing racking A 3D view of a warehouse floor with a column grid. At the back are two rows of selective racking with a forklift aisle between them. The marked critical points are rack legs at midspan between columns, forklift travel paths carrying repeated moving loads, and the slab around column heads at risk of punching shear. At the front is the area where new racking will be installed, with zones for rebar scanning and GPR to find slab thickness, core drilling points, and a Floor Load Test pit at a critical slab span. The panel on the right shows the five-step sequence for a change of use: from stating the new working loads as numbers, requesting existing documents, and having an engineer inspect the site against the new loads, to testing only the points still unanswered, and finally summarizing usage limits that can be written into a contract. 3D model Not to scale Midspan rack legs Max. pressure at plate Forklift aisle Repeated moving load + impact Rebar scan + GPR thickness Input data for engineer’s calc Core points Verify strength Floor Load Test, critical span Real load · deflection/recovery Column heads: punching risk Diagonal cracks at column = check now Change of use: 5 steps 1 State new loads as numbers Pallets, legs, machines, trucks 2 Get existing documents As-built, calcs, test results 3 Engineer inspects site Compare with new loads 4 Test only unanswered points Floor Load Test / Parallel Seismic 5 Write limits into contract kg/m² · per leg · zone plan 500 kg/m² = design minimum 2023 Regulation (warehouse/factory) Not this floor’s actual capacity Check point loads at legs & wheels
3D model — the critical points are rack legs at midspan, forklift aisles and the slab around column heads. The front area shows rebar scanning and GPR, core points and a Floor Load Test at a critical span. The right panel shows the five-step sequence for a change of use. The 500 kg/m² value is a design minimum, not the load any particular floor can actually carry (Image: SPN Soil Engineering)

How Do You Prove How Much Load a Floor Can Actually Carry?

The load capacity of an existing floor can be proven in 3 ways: reviewing existing documents, non-destructive on-site inspection, and actual load testing. They are usually combined, starting with the cheapest and fastest and moving toward the one that gives the most direct evidence.

← Scroll to see the full table →

OptionWhat it involvesLevel of answer
1. Review existing documentsCheck as-built drawings, calculations, concrete and pile test results, permitsShows the design values, but does not confirm it was built to the drawings
2. Non-destructive on-site inspectionRebar and cover scanning, GPR for slab thickness and embedded objects, Rebound Hammer and UPV for concrete quality, Core Test to confirm actual compressive strengthProvides enough input data for an engineer to recalculate the capacity
3. Actual load testingFloor Load Test — apply real load in stages and measure deflection and recoveryEmpirical evidence that the floor can actually carry the tested load level

Option 2 is always needed when no construction drawings survive, which is very common in factories and warehouses that have changed hands several times. The methods used at this stage are explained in NDT for Concrete Structures: What Methods Are There? and What Is GPR Concrete Scanning?

An SPN engineer using Ground Penetrating Radar to scan a floor for slab thickness and objects embedded in the concrete
Ground Penetrating Radar (ASTM D6432) is used to check slab thickness and embedded objects — input data the engineer needs before calculating the load capacity of an existing floor.

What Can a Floor Load Test Tell You?

A Floor Load Test tells you whether the floor can actually carry the tested load level. Real load is placed on the floor area to be proven, and the deflection is measured under load and the recovery after unloading. Its strength is that it provides empirical evidence, without relying on assumptions about rebar size or concrete strength as a calculation alone does.

  • Test load level — set by the engineer from the intended service load, including structural self-weight and code load factors
  • Acceptance criteria — based on ACI 318-19 Chapter 27, which sets the maximum deflection limit and the required recovery after unloading
  • What you get — confirmation that the floor carries the tested load level without permanent damage, plus deflection data for future reference
  • Limitations — only selected points can be tested, so the most critical points must be chosen based on the earlier inspection results, and the test area must be closed off temporarily for safety
Dial gauges installed under the slab soffit to measure floor deflection during a Floor Load Test in a factory building
Dial gauges installed under the slab soffit to measure deflection under the test load — the main data used to judge against ACI 318-19 Chapter 27

Details of staged loading, calculating the total test load and the ACI acceptance criteria are covered in full on Floor Load Test: Testing Floors with Real Loads. For choosing a loading method on site — water ponding, IBC tanks or sandbags — see Which Loading Method for a Floor Load Test?

500
kg/m² minimum under the 2023 Ministerial Regulation for warehouses and factories
2–3 days
Field work for a Floor Load Test per test point
7–14 days
Working days for the final report signed by an engineer

What Signs Show a Floor Is Overloaded?

If you see any of the following signs, reduce the load in use first and have an engineer inspect. Do not wait for the damage to spread.

← Scroll to see the full table →

What you seePossible meaningUrgent inspection?
Parallel cracks on the slab soffit at midspanSlab bending moment exceeds capacityInspect immediately
Diagonal cracks around column heads or rack legsSign of punching shearInspect immediately
Slab deflection visible to the naked eyeSlab strength or stiffness insufficient for the load in useInspect immediately
Localized differential settlement where heavy goods are storedSubgrade settlement, or slab on ground overloadedInspect immediately
Concrete spalling exposing rusted rebarConcrete deterioration; reduced load-carrying cross-sectionInspect immediately
Fine map cracking on the surface, not wideningUsually concrete shrinkage crackingCan be monitored
⚠️ Don’t judge by cracks alone

Cracks tell you something is wrong, but not how much strength the floor has left. Whether it can stay in use, and up to what load level, must be assessed and signed off only by the responsible engineer.

Changing How a Space Is Used: What Must You Do First?

First state the new working loads as numbers, then have an engineer compare them with the existing floor data. The most common case is leasing an old warehouse that used to store light goods and converting it to high-bay racking or installing machinery. The recommended sequence has 5 steps:

  1. State the new working loads as numbers — weight per pallet, number of rack levels, leg spacing, and the weight of machinery and forklifts to be used
  2. Request existing documents from the building owner — as-built drawings, calculations, concrete and pile test results, and the history of extensions
  3. Have an engineer inspect the site and compare it with the new working loads — if the documents are complete and the margin is large, further testing may not be needed
  4. Test only the points still unanswered — a Floor Load Test at critical points, or Parallel Seismic when the existing pile length is unknown
  5. Summarize usage limits that can be written into a contract — e.g. maximum load per square meter, per rack leg, and a zone plan showing where heavy goods may be placed

If you are about to buy or lease a whole building, floor load capacity is only one of 6 categories to inspect. See the full picture in Structural Due Diligence Before Buying or Leasing a Building or Warehouse: What to Inspect

How Much Does It Cost?

Fees for floor inspection and testing depend on the number of points, building area, the load level to be proven and site access, so they are estimated per project. The table below compares relative price levels between items for preliminary budgeting only; these are not actual prices.

← Scroll to see the full table →

ItemPrice levelRemarks
Rebar scanning + GPR for slab thickness💰Charged by number of points or scan area
Rebound Hammer + UPV for concrete quality💰Usually done together in one visit
Core Test: coring and compressive strength testing💰💰Includes patching the core holes
Plate Bearing Test for slabs on ground💰💰Needs space to set up kentledge
Floor Load Test💰💰💰Price per test point, depending on load level and kentledge method

💰 = entry level · 💰💰 = mid level · 💰💰💰 = high level, for comparing items against each other only. Prices exclude travel and equipment mobilization, which are charged extra according to site distance. Get a free quotation within 24 hours via the contact page, or see the overall price structure for inspection work at Structural Inspection & NDT Prices 2026

Summary

The 2023 Ministerial Regulation sets the minimum live load for factory and warehouse floors at 500 kilograms per square meter and prohibits reducing it when designing columns and foundations. But that figure is a design criterion, not an answer to how much the floor of the building you are about to use can actually carry.

An answer you can base decisions on must come from three things together: existing documents and construction drawings, non-destructive on-site inspection results, and actual load testing at critical points. The new working loads must also be converted into point loads at rack legs and vehicle wheels, not just compared as an average per square meter. The final result should be a report certified by a licensed civil engineer (COE license), with signature and registration number, and with usage limits that can actually be written into a lease or a warehouse layout plan.