How do Dynamic and Static Load Tests differ?

A Dynamic Load Test (PDA) drops a ram onto the pile head and analyzes the resulting stress waves, while a Static Load Test applies real load directly onto the pile — the first is faster and cheaper, the second is the most accurate.

Method 1
Dynamic Load Test
ASTM D4945-26 · DPT 1252-51
  • Strain gauges + accelerometers mounted on the pile head
  • Signals recorded during driving or impact
  • CAPWAP analysis to determine pile capacity
  • Skin friction + end bearing obtained separately
  • Testing completed in one day, fast results
Fast · Economical · Most widely used
Method 2
⚖️ Static Load Test
ASTM D1143/D1143M-20e1 · DPT 1251
  • Real dead load (kentledge) or anchor piles for reaction
  • Pile loaded by hydraulic jack in gradual increments
  • Settlement measured precisely at every load step
  • Gives the most accurate load-settlement curve
  • Requires more time and equipment
🎯 Highest accuracy · Suits critical projects

The figure below compares the setup of both methods on the same type of pile — the Dynamic side uses a single impact and reads the answer from the recorded waves, while the Static side needs enough kentledge to push the pile step by step until the load–settlement curve is obtained directly.

Comparison of the principles of the Dynamic Load Test (PDA) and a kentledge Static Load Test on the same pile Two panels side by side. The left panel is the Dynamic Load Test: a ram suspended from a crane drops onto a cushion on the pile head in a pit excavated around the pile head; strain gauges and accelerometers are mounted below the pile head, with cables running to the PDA unit on the ground. A stress wave travels down the pile, and the soil resists with skin friction and toe resistance. Below is an example plot of force and velocity times impedance versus time, which is analyzed with CAPWAP to obtain total capacity, separate skin friction from toe resistance, and driving stresses. The right panel is a kentledge Static Load Test: kentledge blocks sit on a main beam supported on timber cribbing; a hydraulic jack pushes between the pile head and the beam; settlement gauges are mounted on an independently supported reference beam. Below is an example load–settlement plot, with load added in steps and then unloaded, leaving residual settlement. The bottom strip summarizes duration, a cost per pile differing by roughly ten times or more, and the values usable under the 2023 Foundation Ministerial Regulation: PDA 40 percent and Static 50 percent. Principles compared: Dynamic (PDA) vs Static Load Test Not to scale Dynamic Load Test (PDA) One impact, measure waves, analyze Static Load Test (Kentledge) Apply real load in steps, measure settlement Ram from crane Drops onto pile head PDA unit Strain Gauge + Accelerometer Stress wave Travels down, reflects Skin friction End bearing Recorded signals (illustrative) Time → 2L/c Force (F) Velocity × Z CAPWAP gives Capacity · skin/toe · stress Kentledge ≥ max. test load Hydraulic jack P in steps Dial gauges on ref. beam Load–Settlement (illustrative) Load → ← Settles Residual Loading Unload Direct result Ultimate · elastic/residual 1 Duration PDA ½–1 day · Static 1–3 days 2 Cost per pile Static ~10× or more costlier 3 Regulation 2023 Usable value PDA 40% · Static 50%
Principles compared: the Dynamic Load Test (PDA) drops a ram onto the pile head, measures the waves with strain gauges + accelerometers and analyzes them with CAPWAP, while the kentledge Static Load Test applies real load through a hydraulic jack using kentledge as reaction and measures settlement at every step — the plots are illustrative examples, not measured values.

Dynamic vs Static comparison table: every aspect

← Scroll to see the full table →

Topic Dynamic (PDA) Static
StandardASTM D4945 · DPT 1252-51ASTM D1143 · DPT 1251
AccuracyHigh when analyzed with CAPWAP — results may be higher or lower than Static depending on soil conditions, driving energy and setup time (soil setup/relaxation)Highest — measures load–settlement directly and serves as the reference value (capacity still has to be interpreted by a criterion, e.g. Davisson)
Test durationHalf a day–1 day1–3 days
Relative costMore economical (from ~THB 5,500/pile)About 10× or more expensive (THB 50,000–150,000+/pile)
Data obtainedCapacity, Integrity, Driving StressLoad-Settlement, Residual Settlement
Accepted for submission to authorities✓ Accepted✓ Accepted
Bored piles✓ Possible✓ Possible
Integrity check✓ Preliminary✗ No
Measures forces in the pile✓ Yes (driving stress)✗ No

Note: The prices above exclude travel and equipment mobilization, which are charged extra according to the distance to the site.

Which method should your project choose?

🧭 Choose by situation

Choose Dynamic (PDA) when...

The job has many piles, you need checks during construction, the budget is limited, you need fast results, or the project has no special requirements — suitable for houses, general commercial buildings and medium-sized factories.

Choose a Static Load Test when...

The building is highly critical (hospitals, bridges, silos), the designer needs an accurate load-settlement curve, the contract has special requirements, or a dynamic test gave questionable results that need confirmation.

Use both methods together

Large projects often use a static test as a proof test on representative piles and dynamic tests to check large numbers of piles during construction, balancing accuracy and cost.

The model below shows the "combined" approach on a single project: screen integrity first with the Seismic Integrity Test, run a static test on representative piles to confirm actual behavior, then spread Dynamic (PDA) tests across a large number of piles.

3D model of a project using Seismic, Static and Dynamic Load Tests together Conceptual 3D view of a layout of fifteen piles in a soil block cut away to show a section: the upper layer is soft clay, the lower layer is sand. The front row of piles shows their shafts reaching the sand layer. Every pile head is shaded blue, meaning it has passed integrity screening with the Seismic Integrity Test. The representative pile at the back right has a kentledge Static Load Test setup: timber cribbing on both sides, a main beam, a jack and three tiers of kentledge blocks. The pile at the center left has a guide frame and ram for the Dynamic Load Test, wired to a PDA unit, and several other piles carry an orange ring meaning they have been PDA-tested. The panel on the right lists the plan in order: one, Seismic screens integrity but does not measure bearing capacity; two, Static on a small number of representative piles, usable value 50 percent; three, Dynamic spread across many piles and calibrated against a static method, usable value 40 percent; plus a note that the number and locations of test piles are set by the design engineer. 3D model: several methods combined on one project Not to scale 2 Static Load Test Kentledge on rep. pile 3 Dynamic (PDA) Ram + guide frame PDA unit 1 Seismic (PIT) all piles Blue head = screened Orange ring = PDA done Section: soft clay / sand layer Combined test plan sequence 1 Seismic (PIT) Integrity screening No capacity measured 2 Static Load Test Few rep. piles Usable 50% (FS 2.0) 3 Dynamic (PDA) Many piles, calibrated vs static method · 40% (FS 2.5) Static leads → Dynamic follows Confirm actual behavior by Static then PDA covers many piles within a controlled budget No./locations of test piles Set by design engineer Conceptual Not an actual pile layout
Conceptual 3D model: the Seismic Integrity Test screens every pile, a Static Load Test (kentledge) runs on representative piles and Dynamic Load Tests (PDA) are spread across many piles — the number and locations of test piles are set by the design engineer. The image is not an actual pile layout.

How does the Dynamic Load Test work?

Dynamic Load Test (PDA) per ASTM D4945 and DPT 1252-51, with a ram dropped onto the pile head on an actual site
A Dynamic Load Test (PDA) on site — a ram is dropped onto the pile head and the stress waves are measured with sensors (Photo: SPN Soil Engineering)

The Dynamic Load Test, or high strain dynamic testing, per ASTM D4945 and DPT 1252-51, works by mounting strain gauges and accelerometers on the pile head; a crane then lifts a ram or hammer and drops it onto the pile head. The instruments record the resulting force and acceleration waves.

The data are then analyzed with the CAPWAP (CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program) software, which calculates:

  • Total capacity
  • Skin friction for each soil layer
  • End bearing at the pile toe
  • Compressive and tensile stresses in the pile (driving stress)

Read the detailed PDA test procedure at What Is a Dynamic Load Test (PDA)? Procedure and Interpretation and how to read the analysis results at What Is CAPWAP? Understanding PDA Signal Analysis

Good to know

A Dynamic Load Test can be done both during driving and after driving (re-strike). A re-strike gives the set-up effect, which shows how much the capacity has increased after a rest period.

How does the Static Load Test work?

Static Load Test per ASTM D1143, applying real load through a hydraulic jack on an actual site
A Static Load Test (ASTM D1143) — real load is applied to the pile through a hydraulic jack and settlement is measured at each step (Photo: SPN Soil Engineering)

A Static Load Test pushes the pile with a hydraulic jack, increasing the load gradually in steps and measuring the pile settlement at each step. There are 2 main methods:

  • Kentledge Method — concrete or steel blocks are placed on a steel frame as counterweight, and the jack pushes the pile using this weight as reaction. Suitable for open sites where enough weight can be arranged.
  • Anchor Pile Method — anchor piles are installed around the test pile, and steel beams tie the anchor piles to the jack. Suitable for confined sites where placing a large weight is impractical.

Read the full test procedure at What Is a Static Load Test? Procedure, Standards and Interpretation

What Static offers that Dynamic cannot

A Static Load Test gives the load-settlement curve directly, from which the engineer can find the true ultimate load of the pile as well as separate elastic and residual settlement. This information is very valuable for designing buildings with strict settlement requirements.

Seismic Integrity Test — what is the third option?

Besides the two main methods, there is the Seismic Pile Integrity Test (PIT) per DPT 1551-51 (ASTM D5882-16 was withdrawn in 2025), a low strain test that checks only the integrity of the pile, not its bearing capacity. It costs about THB 100–150/pile.

It is ideal for checking all the bored piles on a project economically before running Dynamic or Static tests on selected piles — read an in-depth guide to this method at What Is a Seismic Integrity Test? Check Pile Integrity Before It's Too Late

How much do Dynamic and Static tests cost?

A Dynamic Load Test (PDA) starts at about THB 5,500/pile, while a Static Load Test costs about THB 50,000–150,000+/pile depending on the test load and the reaction method (kentledge or anchor piles) — a difference of about 10× or more.

Note: These prices exclude travel and equipment mobilization, which are charged extra according to the distance to the site.

See detailed prices for every pile test method, with the factors that affect price, at Pile Testing Prices 2026 — PDA, Seismic, Static Load Test or contact us for a free quotation within 24 hours — see the scope of all our pile testing services on the Pile Testing Services page.

What does the 2023 Foundation Ministerial Regulation require for pile testing?

Since the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Building Foundations and Ground Supporting Buildings B.E. 2566 (2023), choosing a pile test method is no longer just about price or speed, because the law sets the pile's "allowable resistance" according to the source of the value — the more reliable the method of proof, the higher the value the law allows.

← Scroll to see the full table →

Source of the pile resistance valueApplicable up toFS equivalent
Calculated from the soil investigation report (static method)40%2.5
Static Load Test (real load test)50%2.0
Dynamic Load Test (PDA)40%2.5 — must be calibrated against a static method

Why does Static get 50% but Dynamic 40%? In short, the Static Load Test applies real load and so has low uncertainty, which is why the law allows a higher value (FS 2.0), while Dynamic is an indirect estimate that must be calibrated against a static method (FS 2.5) — read the full explanation of the 40/50/40 criteria, including Clauses 24–25 and the case of piles over 40 t each, at How Much Load Can a Pile Carry by Law? The 40/50/40 Criteria of the 2023 Foundation Regulation

Budget implications

The difference between 50% and 40% can mean fewer or shorter piles across the whole project, saving many times the cost of testing. Medium-to-large projects therefore favor the formula "Static leads, calibrates, Dynamic follows": static tests on a small number of representative piles to confirm actual behavior, then dynamic tests spread across many piles at a controlled cost — satisfying both the law and the budget.

Read the key points of this Ministerial Regulation in full at Summary of the 2023 Building Foundation Ministerial Regulation (B.E. 2566)

Note: This section is a summary for general understanding, not project-specific legal advice. Please check the actual legal text and consult your project's design engineer.