What Is the DCP Test?

DCP (Dynamic Cone Penetrometer) testing drives a steel cone into the ground by repeatedly dropping a hammer freely from a fixed height, then measures how far the cone penetrates per number of blows. The result is expressed in millimeters per blow (mm/blow), known as the DCP Index.

The DCP Index is converted to in-situ CBR (California Bearing Ratio) using the correlation equations specified in the standard, so the bearing capacity of a soil layer can be assessed without excavating samples for laboratory testing. This makes it widely used for pavement structures, factory floors and compaction quality control.

💡 Rule of thumb

Stiff soil → little penetration → low DCP Index → high CBR  |  Soft soil → large penetration → high DCP Index → low CBR

Why Run a DCP Test? What Are the Benefits?

The main benefit of the DCP test is obtaining in-situ soil strength quickly, without taking samples to the laboratory. The benefits fall into four areas, summarized in the table:

← Scroll to see the full table →

Table 1: Engineering benefits of DCP testing
BenefitDetails
Estimate in-situ CBRCan be used directly for pavement thickness design
Identify layers (strata)Detects the thickness and interfaces of material layers with different strengths
Compaction quality controlLocates "soft spots" or under-compacted areas in fill
Fast and economicalMany points can be tested in a short time; portable equipment reaches remote sites

In pavement quality control, the test team drives the DCP along a line of points in the QC plan. Points with an abnormally high DCP Index pinpoint soft spots beneath the pavement before the next layer is placed, as shown in the illustration below.

3D model of a road under construction with pavement layers checked by DCP along a line of test points, revealing a soft spot in the subgrade Conceptual 3D view of an unsurfaced road under construction. The front end is cut away to show the pavement layers: crushed-rock base on top, laterite subbase below, then the natural subgrade. The side is sectioned along the line of test points. Five DCP test points sit exactly on the section edge, and a dashed line below each runs down in the section plane to a test depth of about 1 m. Points that pass carry a green check mark and their dashed lines stop in normal subgrade. Two points carry a red cross, and their dashed lines reach a translucent red lens in the subgrade section, which is the soft spot. At one point stands a DCP about 1.8 m tall; the operator holds the handle at roughly head height, the 8 kg hammer sits on the guide rod, the anvil is around knee-to-hip level, and the drive rod with measuring scale enters the ground at the test point; in the section the rod and cone have penetrated to the subbase. The right panel explains that passing points have a low DCP Index and high CBR, while soft spots have a high DCP Index and low CBR and should be reported to the engineer for remedial action, such as excavation and replacement or recompaction. A sample CBR-versus-depth graph (hypothetical values) compares a normal point with a soft-spot point. Typical test depth is about 1 m. Notes state that field CBR is not equal to soaked CBR, and that test point locations and spacing follow the project QC plan. 3D model: DCP pavement check for soft spots Not to scale Base Crushed rock Subbase Laterite Subgrade DCP points in a line along the road DCP, 8 kg hammer driven through to subgrade Soft spot in subgrade below high DCP Index Conceptual Section along test points Results along test line Pass Low DCP Index → high CBR Soft Spot High DCP Index → low CBR Refer to engineer (replace / recompact) CBR vs depth (hypothetical) CBR → ← Depth ≈ 1 m Normal Soft Spot Typical test depth ≈ 1 m field CBR ≠ soaked CBR Field ≠ soaked lab value Point location/spacing per project QC plan
Checking the pavement layers of a road under construction with DCP along a line of test points. Points with a high DCP Index (low CBR) indicate a soft spot in the subgrade for the engineer to remedy. Conceptual illustration; field CBR is not equal to soaked CBR. (Diagram: SPN Soil Engineering)
⚠️ Important: field CBR ≠ soaked CBR

The CBR obtained from a DCP is field/in-situ CBR under the actual moisture and density conditions at the time of testing. It is not equal to the soaked CBR from the laboratory (where the specimen is soaked to saturation), so take care when comparing the two or using them as a design reference.

What Does DCP Equipment Consist Of?

A standard DCP consists of an 8 kg hammer that slides and falls freely along a guide rod, transferring the blow to a steel drive rod with a 60° cone tip. The dimensions of each part are specified in ASTM D6951 as follows:

← Scroll to see the full table →

Table 2: Equipment specifications for the 8 kg hammer DCP per ASTM D6951
ComponentSpecification (8-kg DCP)
Hammer8.0 kg (±0.010 kg)
Drop height575 mm (±1.0 mm)
Cone tip60° included angle (±1°), 20 mm base diameter (±0.25 mm)
Drive rod15.8 mm (5/8") diameter steel
Measuring scaleReadable to 1 mm
🔧 4.6 kg hammer option

In very soft soil, where the 8 kg hammer makes the cone penetrate too quickly, a 4.6 kg hammer can be used instead (keeping the same 575 mm drop height), but a Hammer Factor = 2 must be applied when calculating the DCP Index (the 8 kg hammer uses Factor = 1).

There are two cone tip types: the replaceable point, which requires an extraction jack to pull the rod out, and the disposable cone, held on with an O-ring, which detaches and stays in the ground when the rod is pulled out after testing, allowing faster extraction.

Cone tip and drive rod of a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) with a 60-degree included cone angle
60° cone tip and drive rod of a standard 8 kg hammer DCP — lightweight, portable equipment that is easy to take into confined and remote test areas

What Are the Steps of a DCP Test?

A DCP test has 6 main steps, from checking the equipment through to calculating the results. Each step has points to watch so the readings are not compromised, as summarized in the table:

← Scroll to see the full table →

Table 3: DCP test procedure per ASTM D6951 with precautions
StepWhat to doPrecautions
1. Inspect the equipmentCheck the couplers, handle, and wear of the rod and cone tip before starting the testAll joints must be tight — loose joints lose driving energy and distort readings
2. Set the zero pointPlace the cone so its widest part is level with the surface of the layer to be tested, then record the initial readingSet the instrument plumb; any initial tilt increases as the rod is driven deeper
3. Drive the coneRaise the hammer until it lightly touches the handle, then let it fall freely from a height of 575 mmDo not slam the hammer into the handle, and do not push or guide the hammer as it falls
4. Record readingsRecord the number of blows with the cumulative penetration (mm) — read every blow in soft soil, every 5 blows in normal soil and every 10 blows in very stiff soilRead the scale to 1 mm; incomplete records make it impossible to separate the layers
5. Stop at refusalStop the test when 5 blows advance the cone no more than 2 mm, or when the handle deviates more than 75 mm from verticalDo not keep driving into a boulder or hard layer — move to a new point at least 300 mm away
6. Extract and calculateWithdraw the rod with an extraction jack (replaceable point) or by driving the hammer up against the handle (disposable cone), then calculate the DCP Index and convert it to CBRWith a disposable cone, the cone tip stays in the ground — this is normal for this type of equipment

Typical test depth is about 1,000 mm (1 m). For ordinary road work, penetration of up to 900 mm is usually sufficient.

How Do You Calculate CBR from DCP?

The calculation has 2 steps: first determine the DCP Index from the field data, then convert it to CBR using the correlation equation for the soil type.

Step 1: Determine the DCP Index

DCP Index (mm/blow)  =  ( penetration between readings ÷ number of blows ) × Hammer Factor Hammer Factor: 8 kg hammer = 1, 4.6 kg hammer = 2
✅ Example

5 blows, cone penetrates 25 mm with the 8 kg hammer → DCP Index = (25 ÷ 5) × 1 = 5 mm/blow

Step 2: Convert to CBR

ASTM D6951 (based on US Army Corps of Engineers equations) specifies 3 correlation equations by soil type:

General equation:   CBR = 292 / DCP1.12 For all soils except CL soils with CBR < 10 and CH soils
CL soil (CBR < 10):   CBR = 1 / ( 0.017019 × DCP )2 Lean clay with CBR below 10
CH soil:   CBR = 1 / ( 0.002871 × DCP ) High-plasticity clay / fat clay
⚠️ Choose the equation for the right soil type

Selecting the equation is a matter of engineering judgment — the soil classification must be known first. If the wrong equation is used, the CBR will be significantly in error.

DCP Index vs CBR Correlation Table

← Scroll to see the full table →

Table 4: DCP Index vs in-situ CBR (abridged from ASTM D6951 Table 2)
DCP Index (mm/blow)CBR (%)Strength level
< 3100Very stiff
550Stiff
735Good
10–1120Medium
20–2110Fair
30–346Soft
65–662.7Very soft
> 324< 0.5Extremely soft

Table abridged from ASTM D6951 Table 2 (general equation) — use as preliminary guidance only; actual values should be calculated with the equation appropriate to the soil type.

How Do You Interpret Soil Layers from a DCP Plot?

Layer analysis means reading the slope of the DCP plot to separate material layers of different strength. When cumulative penetration (vertical axis) is plotted against cumulative blows (horizontal axis), and the soil has several layers of different strength, the slope of the plot changes at each layer interface:

  • Steep slope = fast penetration = soft soil
  • Shallow slope = slow penetration = stiff soil

The thickness of each layer is found from the intersection of the lines representing the average slopes of adjacent layers. The average DCP Index and CBR of each layer are then calculated separately.

The figure below places the DCP on the pavement layers next to a plot drawn on the same depth scale. The slope of the plot changes exactly at each layer interface; the steeper segments are the weaker layers.

Section of an 8 kg hammer DCP on unsurfaced pavement layers, with a plot of cumulative blows versus cumulative penetration whose slope changes at the layer interfaces The left panel is a section of an 8 kg hammer Dynamic Cone Penetrometer standing plumb on unsurfaced pavement layers: crushed-rock base on top, laterite subbase below, then the natural subgrade. At the top is the handle. The hammer guide rod acts as a track for the 8 kg hammer, which is raised until it touches the handle and then released to fall freely through 575 mm onto the anvil, which is the coupler to the Ø 15.8 mm drive rod. Beside the rod is a measuring scale readable to 1 mm, set on the surface of the test layer, which is the zero point for readings. The cone tip has penetrated into the subbase. An enlarged inset shows the cone with a 60-degree included angle and Ø 20 mm base. The right panel is a plot of cumulative blows versus cumulative penetration (hypothetical values) with its depth axis aligned to the section on the left; dashed lines link the layer interfaces to show that the slope changes exactly at each interface. Base: DCP about 5 mm per blow, CBR about 48%. Subbase: DCP about 10, CBR about 22%. Subgrade: DCP about 30, CBR about 6%. Calculated with the general equation CBR = 292/DCP to the power 1.12 per ASTM D6951. A steep slope means fast penetration, i.e. soft soil. The bottom strip summarizes how to determine the DCP Index, selecting the equation by soil type, and the refusal criterion for stopping. 2D section: DCP and reading layers from the plot Not to scale DCP components Base: crushed rock Subbase: laterite Subgrade 8 8 kg (Hammer) Guide rod (Upper Rod) Anvil/coupler (Anvil/Coupler) Drive rod Ø 15.8 mm (Drive Rod) Handle Drop 575 mm Free-fall hammer Scale Reads to 1 mm Zero point at test surface Cone tip (detail) 60° Ø 20 mm Reading layers from a DCP plot Slope changes at each layer interface CBR = 292 / DCP1.12 General eq. ASTM D6951 DCP in mm/blow Steep slope = fast = soft soil Shallow slope = slow = stiff = layer interface = every 5 blows Cum. blows vs cum. penetration (hypothetical) 20 40 60 200 400 600 800 0 Cum. blows → ← Cum. penetration (mm) Base Subbase Subgrade DCP ≈ 5 mm/blow → CBR ≈ 48% DCP ≈ 10 mm/blow → CBR ≈ 22% DCP ≈ 30 mm/blow → CBR ≈ 6% 1 DCP Index (mm/blow) Penetration ÷ blows (× Hammer Factor) 2 Select equation by soil type General / CL (CBR < 10) / CH 3 Stop criterion (refusal) 5 blows ≤ 2 mm or handle tilt > 75 mm
8 kg hammer DCP per ASTM D6951 (575 mm drop, Ø 15.8 mm drive rod, 60° Ø 20 mm cone) shown with a cumulative blows–cumulative penetration plot (hypothetical values) whose slope changes exactly at the pavement layer interfaces; the DCP Index of each layer is then converted to CBR with the general equation CBR = 292/DCP1.12 (Diagram: SPN Soil Engineering)
✅ Reading the example figure (hypothetical values)

Base layer: 150 mm in 30 blows = 5 mm/blow → CBR ≈ 48% · Subbase: 200 mm in 20 blows = 10 mm/blow → CBR ≈ 22% · Subgrade: 450 mm in 15 blows = 30 mm/blow → CBR ≈ 6% (calculated from CBR = 292/DCP1.12) — the layer with the lowest CBR is the one the designer must focus on, and a location with abnormally low values compared with neighboring points signals a soft spot.

Example of Actual DCP Test Results

The example below is a DCP test report from an actual SPN project (test point LS-DCP-9A), tested from the ground surface to a depth of 2.0 m. The report shows the number of blows, DCP Index and in-situ CBR for each depth interval, with a CBR–depth plot that shows soft and stiff layers in a single view.

Example Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP) report with a DCP Index table and CBR-versus-depth plot
Example of an actual DCP test report (point LS-DCP-9A) — table of DCP Index/CBR by depth interval and CBR–depth plot on the right, prepared by the SPN Soil Engineering engineering team

Note that the top interval (0–100 mm) is an asphalt layer, followed by compacted material with high CBR, alternating with intervals where the value decreases with depth. Plotting CBR against depth like this lets engineers identify the thickness and strength of each layer accurately for pavement structure design.

What Are the Limitations of the DCP?

The main limitations of the DCP relate to the types of material it can test and its limited depth. They can be grouped into "not suitable" and "well suited" as follows:

❌ DCP is not suitable for

Highly stabilized or cemented materials, and coarse granular materials with a large proportion of stones larger than 50 mm (2 in.)

✅ DCP is well suited for

Fine-grained and coarse-grained soils, granular construction materials, and weakly stabilized materials

To test layers beneath a hard layer, such as under a bound pavement surface, an access hole must first be drilled or cored, leaving about 10–20 mm of the hard layer, and the DCP is then driven through the remainder.

Which Standard Does the DCP Test Follow?

The main standard for the DCP test is ASTM D6951, which covers the equipment specifications, procedure and CBR correlation equations:

  • ASTM D6951 / D6951M-18 — Standard Test Method for Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Shallow Pavement Applications (first issued in 2003 · the -18 edition was reapproved in 2023)
  • The CBR–DCP equations are based on research by the US Army Corps of Engineers (Webster et al., 1992 / 1994)

DCP repeatability is a standard deviation of less than 2 mm/blow in coarse granular materials, making it a relatively reliable field test.

The DCP mainly provides strength data for the shallow zone, so it is often combined with other tests to provide complete data for design and quality control:

  • DCP vs KPT vs SPT — comparing three probing methods and choosing the right one for the job
  • Field Density Test — verifies % compaction against the specification; used with the DCP, which checks the uniformity of strength
  • Plate Bearing Test — determines the bearing capacity and modulus of subgrade reaction (k) of compacted layers
  • Soil investigation + SPT — deep soil profile data for foundation and pile design
📌 Note

This article is provided as engineering knowledge. The choice of test method, number of points and interpretation of results should follow the project requirements and the judgment of a licensed engineer.