How many ways can a retaining wall fail, and what FS does the law require?

Retaining walls do not fail in just one way. There are 3 main failure mechanisms, and Clause 31 of the 2023 Foundation Ministerial Regulation sets a separate minimum factor of safety for each of them for retaining walls with a base. The wall must pass all three, not just one. The forces acting on the wall are to be calculated as prescribed by the Minister (Clause 31, paragraph one):

1. Sliding — FS ≥ 1.50

Earth pressure behind the wall pushes it forward. Resistance comes from friction under the base and passive resistance of the soil in front of the wall. If the soil under the base is soft or the groundwater is high, resistance drops sharply. The ratio of resisting force to driving force must be not less than 1.50.

2. Overturning — FS ≥ 2.00

Earth pressure creates a moment that rotates the wall about the front edge of the base. The self-weight of the wall and the soil bearing on the base resist it. The taller the wall, the faster the overturning moment grows. The ratio of resisting moment to overturning moment must be not less than 2.00.

3. Bearing capacity of the foundation soil — FS ≥ 3.00

The wall weight and earth pressure combine to press eccentrically on the soil under the base, so the front edge of the base takes the highest stress. If the soil under the base cannot carry it, the wall will settle and tilt even without sliding or overturning. This criterion is consistent with the FS = 3 principle for ordinary spread footings (also related to the Plate Bearing Test condition; read When Does a Plate Bearing Test Become Mandatory?)

← Scroll to see the full table →

CheckMinimum factor of safety under the 2023 Ministerial Regulation (Clause 31)
Sliding1.50
Overturning2.00
Bearing capacity of foundation soil3.00

These criteria are part of the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Building Foundations and Ground Supporting Buildings B.E. 2566 (2023), which covers everything from soil investigation, spread footings and piles to retaining walls — for an overview of the whole regulation, see The 2023 Foundation Ministerial Regulation Simply Explained

A cantilever retaining wall and its three failure mechanisms — sliding, overturning and bearing failure of the soil under the base — with the minimum factors of safety under the Ministerial Regulation A three-panel figure; each panel shows a section of the same L-shaped retaining wall, with backfill behind it higher than the soil in front. A triangular active lateral earth pressure acts on the back of the wall. The first panel is sliding: earth pressure pushes the wall forward, resisted by friction under the base and the soil in front of the wall; the ratio of resisting force to driving force must be not less than 1.50. The second panel is overturning: earth pressure creates a moment rotating the wall about the toe of the base, resisted by the weight of the wall and the soil on the heel; the ratio of resisting moment to overturning moment must be not less than 2.00. The third panel is bearing capacity: the contact pressure under the base is non-uniform, highest at the toe; the ratio of ultimate bearing capacity to contact pressure must be not less than 3.00. A strip at the bottom summarizes the soil data needed to calculate all three values. Retaining wall: 3 failure modes & min. FS (2023 Reg.) Not to scale 1 Sliding FS ≥ 1.50 ΣResist ÷ ΣDriving Earth press. Push forward Base friction resists sliding Front soil resists Slides Soft base soil/high GWL → less resist. 2 Overturning FS ≥ 2.00 ΣMresist ÷ ΣMover Mover Ws soil on heel W wall Pivot = toe of base Taller → Mover grows fast 3 Bearing FS ≥ 3.00 qult ÷ base pressure Max. q at the toe Base soil fails → settles & tilts Earth press. Eccentric 1 Soil γ, φ, c Backfill + base soil 2 Base soil bearing cap. SPT / Plate Bearing Test 3 GW level Borehole / obs. well
Section of a cantilever retaining wall showing earth pressure behind the wall, wall weight W, base friction and the pivot at the toe of the base — the 2023 Foundation Ministerial Regulation sets minimum factors of safety of 1.50 for sliding, 2.00 for overturning and 3.00 for bearing capacity

What soil data do you need before designing a retaining wall?

A key point many people overlook: none of the three FS values can be calculated without knowing the actual soil properties — of the soil behind the wall and under the base — and the groundwater level:

← Scroll to see the full table →

CheckSoil parameters neededObtained from
Lateral earth pressureUnit weight, internal friction angle (φ), cohesion (c)Soil boring + laboratory testing
SlidingBase friction, properties of soil under the baseSoil boring + SPT + shear strength testing
Bearing capacityBearing capacity of soil under the baseSoil boring, SPT, or Plate Bearing Test
Effect of waterGroundwater level, seasonal variationBoreholes / observation wells
⚠️ The most common mistake is "water"

Water pressure behind a wall that cannot drain fast enough adds enormous thrust, far beyond what the design allowed for. Many retaining wall failures happen after heavy rain. Knowing the groundwater level from a soil investigation and designing the drainage behind the wall are therefore as important as the structure itself. Read more in How Groundwater Affects Foundations

For soft clay layers, shear strength can be measured directly in the field with a Field Vane Shear Test, together with SPT results and laboratory testing, to make the design parameters as reliable as possible.

Which projects need a retaining wall FS check?

The three FS criteria in Clause 31 are written for retaining walls with a base, such as gravity walls and cantilever walls. Systems without a base, such as sheet piles, use other checks such as embedment depth and anchor forces (compare each type in Types of Retaining Walls and How to Choose One). Common examples:

  • Retaining walls along roads or between land at different levels — in housing estates or hillside homes
  • Basement walls of buildings — carrying both earth pressure and permanent water pressure
  • Riverbank and canal-bank walls — facing water-level changes on both sides throughout the year
  • High fills close to a neighboring property line — many neighbor disputes over slumping fill start with a retaining wall that was not engineered properly

Not sure whether your job needs an engineer to design it? Read the criteria in Building a Retaining Wall: When Is an Engineer Required? And if you are comparing construction systems, see the cost factors in Precast vs Cast-in-Place Retaining Walls: What Drives the Price

How do you start a retaining wall project legally? Soil boring → design → FS check

  1. Soil investigation along the wall alignment — collect soil layer data, SPT values, samples for laboratory testing, and the groundwater level
  2. Engineer designs from actual soil data — sets the wall section and drainage system and checks that all three FS values meet the criteria
  3. Prepare design calculations that trace the source of the soil values — for permit applications or confirmation with the parties involved

SPN covers both stages: soil investigation and testing and geotechnical engineering design, which includes retaining structures — so design is based on the site's actual soil data, all in one place.

The 3D view below links the soil data to the three FS checks: soil boring along the wall alignment, SPT testing and sampling to determine γ, φ, c, establishing the groundwater level, and then calculating FS against the minimum criteria.

3D model: collecting soil data along a retaining wall alignment to check all three factors of safety under the Ministerial Regulation Conceptual 3D view of a soil block cut away to show the layers: fill, soft clay, stiff clay and sand. On the ground surface an orange dashed line marks the alignment of the wall to be built, with stakes at each end. On this alignment a tripod boring rig is drilling one hole, and the front section shows another borehole with sampling and SPT points at intervals. A blue dashed line is the groundwater level. The box on the right shows the three factors of safety as bars against the minimum criteria — sliding 1.50, overturning 2.00 and bearing capacity 3.00 — for retaining walls with a base under Clause 31 of the 2023 Foundation Ministerial Regulation. In the hypothetical example two checks pass, but bearing capacity is 2.6, below 3.00, so the design must be revised and rechecked; all three must pass. 3D model: from actual soil data to all 3 FS checks Not to scale Fill Soft clay Stiff clay Sand 1 Boring along wall line Orange line = planned wall 2 SPT + sampling Lab tests for γ, φ, c 3 GW level More water pressure · less resist. 4 Soil under wall base For sliding + bearing checks Check all 3 FS Cl. 31 · walls with a base Sliding ≥ 1.50 Example 1.80 Overturning ≥ 2.00 Example 2.40 Bearing capacity ≥ 3.00 Example 2.60 Any fail → revise design recheck until all 3 pass Values are hypothetical
3D model — ① soil boring along the wall alignment (orange line) ② SPT testing and sampling at depth intervals to determine γ, φ, c ③ the groundwater level increases pressure and reduces resistance ④ the soil under the wall base is used to check sliding and bearing capacity. Right box: hypothetical FS values for the three checks against the minimum criteria of 1.50 / 2.00 / 3.00 for retaining walls with a base (2023 Foundation Ministerial Regulation, Clause 31). This example passes two checks, but bearing capacity is 2.60, so the design must be revised and rechecked (image: SPN Soil Engineering)

Summary: FS must pass all 3 checks and be calculated from actual soil

The 2023 Foundation Ministerial Regulation clearly sets the safety criteria for retaining walls: sliding (1.50), overturning (2.00) and bearing capacity of the foundation soil (3.00), with every value calculated from actual soil properties. A safe and legally compliant retaining wall therefore starts with a soil investigation, followed by design by an engineer who has actually seen the soil data for that site — not an off-the-shelf design copied from elsewhere.

📌 Disclaimer

This article summarizes the Ministerial Regulation for general understanding only. It is not legal or engineering advice for any specific project. For practical use, refer to the official text of the Ministerial Regulation as published in the Royal Gazette and consult the licensed engineer for your project.