Columns or beams with rust stains running down, render bulging in sheets, or exposed reinforcement are signs that the steel inside is already corroding. Patching over the surface without fixing the cause usually brings the problem back within a few years. This article explains the mechanism, the test set used to assess the member before repair, and the repair sequence accepted in structural inspection (NDE) practice.

Four stages of concrete spalling caused by rebar corrosion, and a proper repair compared with a local patch repair The top row shows sections of the concrete cover over the reinforcement in four stages. Stage 1, sound concrete: alkaline conditions at pH about 12.5 to 13.5 form a passive film that protects the steel. Stage 2: carbon dioxide or chloride penetrates to the level of the steel and destroys the film; the steel rusts and expands, cracking the concrete along the bar. Stage 3, delamination: a crack parallel to the surface forms a plane at the steel level; the surface has not yet fallen off and sounds hollow when tapped, which is the most cost-effective time to repair. Stage 4, spalling: the cover falls off, the steel is exposed and its cross-section is reduced. The bottom left shows a proper repair per ICRI 310.1R: break out about 20 to 25 millimeters behind the bar and about 50 to 75 millimeters beyond the corroded zone, clean the steel, then repair with a compatible material. The bottom right shows a local patch in concrete with widespread chloride: the steel inside the patch becomes passive again, but the steel at the patch edge, still in contaminated concrete, becomes a new anode, known as an incipient anode, causing renewed spalling at the edge of the repair. Rebar corrosion → spalling: 4 stages and a lasting repair Not to scale 1 Sound concrete Cover Concrete surface Alkaline passive film pH ~12.5–13.5 protects steel 2 Corrosion starts CO₂ Cl⁻ pH drop/Cl⁻ reaches bar Rust expands, cracks cover 3 Cracked Delamination Tap = hollow sound Crack parallel at rebar Surface still intact Best time to repair 4 Broken off Spalling Cover lost, rebar exposed Bar section reduced ≥ ~20% → engineer to check ✓ Proper repair (ICRI 310.1R) Corroded zone Extend 50–75 mm 20–25 mm behind bar Break out → clean rust → compatible repair material Then protective coating + fix leaks/ponding at source ✗ Local patch in chloride-laden concrete Patch (new high-pH mortar) Bar at patch edge = new anode (incipient / ring anode) → spalls at edge Fix: wider breakout or galvanic anode per engineer
How concrete spalling develops: the passive film is lost through carbonation or chloride → the steel corrodes and expands, cracking the concrete along the bar → a delamination plane forms parallel to the surface (hollow sound when tapped) → the cover spalls off, exposing the bar and reducing its cross-section. The bottom row compares a proper repair (breaking out behind the bar and beyond the corroded zone) with a local patch, where the bar at the patch edge becomes a new anode.

Why does concrete spall?

Concrete spalling is when the concrete cover over the reinforcement cracks and breaks away from the section. The most common cause is corroding reinforcement. Corrosion products occupy several times the volume of the original steel, and the expansive pressure first cracks the concrete along the bar, then breaks it off in slabs.

A common misconception is that the concrete only cracks once the rust has fully expanded 2–6 times. Research shows surface cracks appear when the steel has corroded only a few tens of micrometers, and before spalling becomes visible the concrete usually passes through a stage where it has already cracked in a plane parallel to the surface along the bars (delamination). This stage can be detected by hammer tapping or Impact Echo, and it is the most cost-effective time to repair.

Reinforcement in sound concrete is protected by high alkalinity (pH about 12.5–13.5), which forms a thin film on the steel surface. This film can be destroyed by 2 main mechanisms:

  • Carbonation — carbon dioxide from the air penetrates the concrete and lowers its alkalinity. Once it reaches the steel, the protective film breaks down. Checked with the Carbonation Test
  • Chloride ingress — sea-salt spray, saline groundwater or chemicals break the protective film locally and cause pitting corrosion. Checked by measuring chloride content in concrete

Common accelerating factors on site are concrete cover thinner than designed, existing cracks that let moisture in, and spots with regular ponding or leaks. Other causes unrelated to corrosion, such as fire heat or impact, can also cause spalling, but the damage looks different.

📚 Key points

Cracks along the reinforcement with reddish-brown rust stains seeping out are a specific sign of corrosion, unlike shrinkage or settlement cracks, which usually show no rust staining.

What are the warning signs before concrete spalls?

Corrosion damage gives warning signs before the concrete breaks off in slabs. Watch for these 5 signs:

  • Reddish-brown rust stains seeping from cracks or the concrete surface
  • Long cracks running parallel to the reinforcement in columns, beams and slab soffits
  • Render bulging in sheets that sounds hollow when tapped (delamination), even if it has not fallen off
  • White deposits or salt efflorescence on the concrete surface, especially in seaside buildings and under parking deck slabs
  • Earlier patch repairs cracking again in the same location

Light hammer tapping (hammer sounding) is the fastest and cheapest screening method for mapping areas that have delaminated but not yet fallen off, and should always be done before choosing detailed test locations.

What should be tested before repair?

A pre-repair investigation must answer 3 questions: what is the cause, how extensive is the damage, and has load capacity been reduced. The usual test set has 5 items:

← Scroll to see the full table →

Test itemWhat it answersReference standards
Concrete cover measurementIs the cover too thin? Where are the bars?BS 1881-204 · DPT 1505-51
Carbonation depth measurementHas the loss of alkalinity reached the steel?EN 14630 / RILEM CPC-18
Chloride content measurementDoes chloride exceed the corrosion-initiation level?ASTM C1152 / C1218
Half-Cell PotentialProbability that the steel is actively corrodingASTM C876 · DPT 1506-51
Concrete core drillingActual remaining compressive strengthASTM C42
2D section of a reinforced concrete beam with early rebar corrosion, showing what each pre-repair test reads from the same section Cross-section of a reinforced concrete beam with three bottom bars, two top bars and stirrups. The side and bottom faces have a light-brown carbonated layer where pH has dropped. The left bottom bar is coated in rust, with a crack running from the bar to the surface with rust staining. Number one: a cover meter placed on the right face measures cover c from the surface to the steel. Number two: a strip sprayed with phenolphthalein on the left face; the outer part that does not change color is the carbonation depth dk, and the inner pink part is still alkaline. Number three: a drill hole collecting concrete powder from the bottom face at three depth intervals to measure chloride content. Number four: the reference electrode of the Half-Cell Potential test touches the bottom face through a damp sponge, wired to a voltmeter and back to the reinforcement to measure electrical potential. The right panel summarizes the five tests with the question each answers and the reference standard: concrete cover per BS 1881-204 and DPT 1505-51, carbonation depth per EN 14630, chloride content per ASTM C1152 or C1218, Half-Cell Potential per ASTM C876 and DPT 1506-51, and core drilling per ASTM C42. The bottom strip summarizes the three questions to answer before repair: cause, extent of damage, and remaining strength. 2D section: what each pre-repair test reads Not to scale c dₖ mV 1 2 3 4 RC beam section Bottom bar starting to rust Carbonated layer pH drops inward Phenolphthalein Pink = still alkaline Rust + crack along the rebar Drill concrete powder 3 depths → chloride Cover meter Half-Cell Potential Surface potential What each test answers 1 Concrete cover measurement Is cover too thin? BS 1881-204 · DPT 1505-51 2 Carbonation depth Reached the steel yet? EN 14630 / RILEM CPC-18 3 Chloride content Above initiation level? ASTM C1152 / C1218 4 Half-Cell Potential Chance steel is corroding ASTM C876 · DPT 1506-51 5 Concrete core drilling Actual remaining compressive strength ASTM C42 1 What is the cause? Carbonation or chloride 2 How extensive? Often wider than visible 3 Strength reduced? Bar section · concrete strength
2D section of a beam whose bottom bars are starting to corrode, showing what each test reads from the same section: (1) cover c, (2) carbonation depth dₖ from phenolphthalein spray, (3) concrete powder at three depths for chloride, (4) Half-Cell potential between the surface reference electrode and the reinforcement.

Results from Half-Cell Potential per ASTM C876 are read as probabilities, not definitive answers. The commonly cited criteria are values measured against a copper/copper sulfate reference electrode (Cu/CuSO₄ or CSE), as follows:

← Scroll to see the full table →

Potential (vs. CSE)Meaning
More positive than −200 mVCorrosion probability below 10%
−200 to −350 mVUncertain; check other results
More negative than −350 mVCorrosion probability above 90%

If another reference electrode such as Ag/AgCl is used, convert the values before comparing them with the criteria, and always use this result together with carbonation, chloride and concrete cover measurements.

⚠️ Cautions

Never conclude the cause from a single test result. For example, a strongly negative Half-Cell value can also be caused by water-saturated concrete. Interpretation must be done by an engineer, considering the full data set together with actual site conditions.

How is spalled concrete repaired?

An effective repair has 6 steps, starting with defining the extent and ending with protection against recurrence. In the Thai context, DPT 1901-51, the standard practice for concrete repair, and DPT 1902-62, the standard for inspection and strength assessment of old and damaged building structures, both issued by the Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning, form the main framework. International guidance used for supporting detail is ACI 562 for assessment and repair design, ACI 546R for repair methods, ICRI 310.1R for surface preparation, and the EN 1504 series for repair materials.

  1. Define the extent — combine hammer sounding with test results to define the area that actually has to be broken out, which is usually wider than the visibly spalled zone
  2. Break out unsound concrete — break out about 20–25 mm behind the reinforcement so the bar can be repaired all around, and about 50–75 mm beyond the corroded zone, following ICRI 310.1R
  3. Clean the steel — remove rust down to clean steel, then assess the remaining section loss
  4. Decide on the steel — if section loss is large enough to affect strength, add new reinforcement as specified by the engineer
  5. Repair with a compatible material — choose a repair mortar whose mechanical and shrinkage properties are close to the existing concrete, to reduce the risk of cracking at the interface
  6. Prevent recurrence — apply an anti-carbonation or anti-chloride coating, and fix the leaks or ponding that caused the problem
3D model of a concrete column spalled by rebar corrosion, showing the three boundaries to define before repair: the visibly spalled area, the area that sounds hollow when tapped, and the actual breakout area Conceptual 3D view of a reinforced concrete wall-column on a floor slab. On the front face, the concrete cover has spalled off, exposing two corroded vertical bars and stirrups. Above it is a crack along the bar with brown rust staining. An irregular orange dashed line surrounds the area that sounds hollow when tapped, which is wider than the spalled area. A rectangular blue dashed line is the actual breakout boundary, cut square and the largest of the three. A sounding hammer is shown on the left. The side face of the column has three cause-finding test points: a chloride powder sampling point, a carbonation measurement point and a core hole. Water ponds at the column base, accelerating corrosion. The lower-left panel shows measuring the remaining bar diameter with a vernier caliper after rust removal; if section loss is about 20 percent or more, an engineer should recheck by calculation. The lower-right panel explains the three line types. The right panel summarizes the six repair steps: define the extent; break out unsound concrete 20 to 25 millimeters behind the bar and 50 to 75 millimeters beyond the rust; clean the steel; decide on additional reinforcement; repair with a compatible material; and prevent recurrence. 3D model: defining the repair area on a spalled column Not to scale Crack along the rebar with brown rust staining Hammer sounding Hollow = delaminated Ponding · leaks Accelerator: fix at source Actual breakout area Square-cut edges, widest Cause-finding tests Chloride · carbonation and core Sounds hollow Wider than visible Spalled concrete Bar exposed, section lost Measure remaining bar Loss ~20% or more → engineer to recheck by calc. Lines on the column face Spalled, visible Hollow (delaminated) Actual breakout area Conceptual view, not a repair drawing 6-step repair sequence 1 Define the extent Sounding + test results 2 Break out bad concrete 20–25 mm behind bar 3 Clean the steel Remove rust to clean steel 4 Decide on the steel Add bars as engineer specifies 5 Compatible repair material Shrinkage close to original 6 Prevent recurrence Coating + fix leaks/ponding Break out beyond the rust by about 50–75 mm per ICRI 310.1R Actual values set by engineer to suit site conditions
3D model of defining the repair area on a spalled column: the visibly spalled area is the smallest, the area that sounds hollow when tapped (orange dashed line) is wider, and the actual breakout area (blue dashed line) is cut square and is the widest, with the 6-step repair sequence (conceptual view).

There are 2 common mistakes. The first is not breaking out behind the bar, so rust at the back keeps spreading under the new repair mortar. The second is patching locally in a structure with widespread chloride. When patched with new high-alkalinity mortar, the steel inside the patch returns to a passive state, but the steel next to the patch edge is still in the original contaminated concrete, so it becomes a new anode that corrodes instead. This is called the incipient anode or ring anode effect, and it leads to renewed spalling at the edge of the repair within a few years.

It can be prevented by extending the breakout beyond the actual contaminated zone, or by adding a supplementary corrosion protection system, such as zinc anodes for cathodic protection (galvanic anodes), as specified by the engineer.

When does structural capacity need to be reassessed?

Strength must be reassessed when the damage is not just superficial but affects the reinforcement or primary members. There are 4 cases where an engineer should check by calculation:

  • Significant loss of reinforcement cross-section, generally considered from about 20% upward
  • Damage to primary members such as columns, main beams or column heads carrying high shear
  • Broken stirrups or heavy stirrup section loss, which affects both shear strength and confinement
  • Spalling spread across many locations on the same floor or throughout the building

The figures above are guideline thresholds for deciding whether a detailed investigation is needed. Conclusions on remaining strength, safe level of use and the strengthening scheme must come from calculations by the responsible engineer based on the building's actual condition, which may extend into a whole-building assessment of an old building.

✅ The most cost-effective sequence

Start with hammer sounding to map the extent, then check the cause with the basic test set, and only then choose the repair method. Investigating before repair usually costs less than repairing the wrong way and having to tear it all out and redo it.

How much does an assessment cost?

Fees depend on the number of test points, the tests selected, and the height and access of the site. Contact us for a free quotation within 24 hours. This price excludes travel and equipment mobilization costs, which are charged extra depending on the distance to site. Reports are certified by a civil engineer licensed by the Council of Engineers Thailand (COE), with signature and license number, and can be submitted to the relevant authorities.