This article walks through a real job: what the results look like, how to read them, and why a pile length figure alone is not enough. It has to be overlaid on the soil boring results before it can answer the design engineer's questions. For the principles of the test method, see What is the Parallel Seismic Test?

What Was the Brief for This Project?

The brief was to obtain 2 pieces of information for the design engineer before calculations began: how long the existing piles are and what soil layers lie beneath the site. The project was a structural investigation to provide data for building renovation of an existing factory that had been in use for many years. The owner wanted to renovate the building, but no construction drawings or pile driving records remained.

SPN carried out both parts under one project so that the pile and soil data share the same reference level. The scope of work had 2 parts:

  • Parallel Seismic tests on 2 piles (TP#1 and TP#2) inside the building, tested on 24 September 2026, with the method referenced to ASTM D8381/D8381M-21
  • 1 soil boring (BH-1) to 30.45 m inside the building, drilled on 15–16 September 2026, with laboratory soil testing
SPN's Parallel Seismic data acquisition unit in the foreground as an engineer strikes the excavated foundation next to the PVC pipe inside a factory building in Samut Prakan
The SPN team running a Parallel Seismic test on pile TP#1 inside the factory: the data acquisition unit is in the foreground; behind it are the excavated foundation and the PVC pipe installed beside the pile (Image: SPN Soil Engineering)

How Were the Pipes Installed and the Parallel Seismic Test Run on Site?

Parallel Seismic requires a pipe parallel to the pile for lowering a sensor, and the foundation is struck to measure the time the wave takes to reach each depth. On this job, a hole was drilled and a 2-inch PVC pipe was installed next to each pile and filled with water as the wave-transmitting medium. The foundation was then struck with a hammer while the receiver (hydrophone) was pulled up approximately 0.5 m per hammer blow.

3D model of the Parallel Seismic tests on piles TP#1 and TP#2 and boring BH-1 inside the factory (conceptual) Conceptual 3D view of the factory floor cut away to show a soil section at the front. On the floor are 2 excavations exposing the foundations of building columns: pile TP#1 on the left and TP#2 on the right. Beside each pile, a water-filled 2-inch PVC pipe is installed parallel into the ground, 1.20 m from the pile at TP#1 and 1.40 m at TP#2. The pipe top projects slightly above the floor and the pipe bottom is deeper than the pile toe. At TP#1 an engineer strikes the foundation with a hammer; the wave travels down the pile and through the soil to the hydrophone suspended in the pipe, which is pulled up approximately 0.5 m per blow. The signal cable runs up to the data acquisition unit on the factory floor, where another engineer monitors the readings. Between the two test locations is soil boring BH-1, 30.45 m deep. The soil section shows fill from 0 to 1.50 m, very soft to medium stiff clay from 1.50 to 23.00 m, and very stiff clay from 23.00 to 30.45 m, with the middle depth range shortened by a break line. Red dots mark the pile toes of TP#1 at approximately 23.35 m and TP#2 at approximately 22.60 m below the factory floor, straddling the layer boundary at 23.0 m. Numbers 1 to 6 in the image correspond to the descriptions in the box below. Plan positions and proportions are conceptual and not to scale. 3D model: TP#1 · TP#2 tests and BH-1 boring in factory Not to scale ≈ 23.35 m ≈ 22.60 m TP#1 TP#2 BH-1 1 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 Fill 0–1.50 m V. soft CLAY to medium stiff 1.50–23.00 m V. stiff CLAY 23.00–30.45 m Break = depth cut Orange arrow = hammer wave down the pile, then through soil to pipe Conceptual · plan positions and proportions are not project data 1 Hammer blow on the cap of the pile under test 4 Data acquisition unit on floor Records wave arrival at each depth 2 2" PVC pipe, water-filled, by pile 1.20 m from pile (TP#1), 1.40 m (TP#2) 5 Pile toe below factory floor TP#1 ≈ 23.35 m · TP#2 ≈ 22.60 m 3 Hydrophone in pipe Pulled up approx. 0.5 m per blow 6 Boring BH-1, 30.45 m deep Layer boundary at 23.0 m = pile toe level
Conceptual 3D model of the testing on this job: the foundations of TP#1 and TP#2 are struck with a hammer and the wave is received by a hydrophone in a water-filled 2-inch PVC pipe beside each pile, with boring BH-1 inside the same building. Plan positions and proportions are not to scale (Image: SPN Soil Engineering)

← Scroll to see the full table →

Parallel Seismic pipe installation on this job
ItemTP#1TP#2
Pipe distance from pile1.20 m1.40 m
Pipe depth (from pipe top)29.15 m30.80 m
Pipe size2-inch PVC, water-filled
Sensor pull-up intervalApprox. 0.5 m per hammer blow
Impact pointOn the foundation of the pile under test

Two figures are worth noting:

  • The pipes extend about 5–8 m below the pile toes found, because seeing the change in slope of the graph requires several data points below the toe. If a pipe is so shallow that it ends right near the pile toe, the result cannot be concluded.
  • Pipe distances of 1.20–1.40 m are within the criteria stated in the report: no more than 2.5 m, and the pipe must not be inclined.

The section below brings every element of this job together in one figure, from the impact point on the foundation, the PVC pipe beside the pile and the sensor positions, to the soil layers from boring BH-1. Depths are drawn to true scale relative to the factory floor, so you can see at a glance how far the pipe extends below the pile toe and where the toe sits within the soil profile.

Section of the Parallel Seismic test on pile TP#1 overlaid on the soil layers from boring BH-1, with depths to scale relative to the factory floor Conceptual model section with depths to scale from the factory floor, 0 to 30 m; horizontal distances and the part above the floor are not to scale. Item one: a hammer blow on the foundation sends a wave down the existing pile. Item two: a water-filled 2-inch PVC pipe 1.20 m from the pile, with its top 0.40 m above the floor and its bottom at approximately 28.75 m. Item three: the hydrophone is pulled up approximately 0.5 m per blow. Item four: alongside the pile, the wave travels in concrete at approximately 4,000 m/s. Item five: below the pile toe, the wave must pass through soil at approximately 1,500 m/s. Item six: pile toe of TP#1 at approximately 23.35 m and TP#2 at approximately 22.60 m, at the layer boundary at 23.0 m. Item seven: boring BH-1, 30.45 m deep, groundwater level 1.00 m, SPT-N 8 at 22.5 m and 20 at 24.0 m. Item eight: the data acquisition unit on the factory floor. Soil layers: fill from 0 to 1.5 m; soft to medium stiff clay (CH), Su 0.67 to 2.63 t/m², to 23.0 m; below that, very stiff to hard sandy clay, SPT-N 20 to 55. Parallel Seismic TP#1: setup, impact and wave path Depth to scale · horizontal not to scale 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 ← Depth below factory floor (m) Foundation Existing pile TP#1 Column 1 2 Pipe base ≈ 28.75 m 1.20 m 4 Pull up ~0.5 m/blow 3 5 Pile toe ≈ 23.35 m (TP#2 ≈ 22.60 m) 6 Layer boundary 23.0 m BH-1 ▽ −1.00 N=8 N=20 EOH 30.45 m 7 Recorder 8 Soil layers (BH-1) Fill 0–1.5 m Soft clay– medium stiff (CH) Su 0.67–2.63 t/m² V. stiff CLAY –hard (sandy CLAY) SPT-N 20–55 Below 23.0 m 23.0 m 4 Along the pile Fast wave ~4,000 m/s 5 Below the toe Slow through soil ~1,500 m/s 6 Time break point = pile toe
Conceptual model section of the Parallel Seismic test on pile TP#1 overlaid on the soil layers from BH-1: depths are to scale relative to the factory floor; horizontal distances and the part above the floor are not to scale (Image: SPN Soil Engineering)
  1. Hammer blow on the foundation sends a wave down the existing pile
  2. Water-filled 2-inch PVC pipe 1.20 m from the pile, 29.15 m long from the pipe top
  3. Hydrophone pulled up approximately 0.5 m per hammer blow
  4. Alongside the pile the wave travels in concrete at ~4,000 m/s
  5. Below the pile toe the wave must pass through soil at ~1,500 m/s, so the graph changes slope
  6. Pile toe TP#1 ≈ 23.35 m (TP#2 ≈ 22.60 m) at the layer boundary at 23.0 m
  7. Boring BH-1, 30.45 m deep SPT-N = 8 at 22.5 m → 20 at 24.0 m
  8. Data acquisition unit on the factory floor, recording wave arrival time at every depth
PVC pipe for Parallel Seismic testing installed beside a column foundation in a factory, surrounded by traffic cones and barrier tape, with the signal cable running to the test vehicle behind
The 2-inch PVC pipe for pile TP#2, installed 1.40 m from the pile beside the column foundation. The pipe top projects slightly above the floor, so its level relative to the floor must always be recorded (Image: SPN Soil Engineering)

How Are Parallel Seismic Results Read, and What Pile Lengths Were Found?

The pile toes on this job are 23.35 m (TP#1) and 22.60 m (TP#2) below the factory floor, read from the point where the graph changes slope. The Parallel Seismic result is a graph of wave arrival time at the sensor versus depth. While the sensor is alongside the pile, the wave travels down through the concrete, which is fast (this job used an analysis value of 4,000 m/s), so the data points line up along a steep straight line. Once the sensor goes below the pile toe, the wave must travel through the slower soil (about 1,500 m/s), so the slope of the graph changes. The point where the slope changes is the pile toe level.

Reading the Parallel Seismic graph for pile TP#1: the point where the slope changes is the pile toe, plus conversion of the reference level from the pipe top to the factory floor Conceptual model diagram based on the values for pile TP#1, with the pipe 1.20 m from the pile. The horizontal axis is the wave arrival time at the sensor, 0 to 10 milliseconds; the vertical axis is depth from the PVC pipe top, 0 to 30 m. Data points every 0.5 m from 1 to 23.5 m line up along a steep straight line whose slope equals the wave velocity in the pile, approximately 4,000 m/s. Below 23.75 m the data points change slope, to a velocity of approximately 1,500 m/s, because the wave must travel through soil. The break at 23.75 m from the pipe top, at approximately 6.7 milliseconds, is the pile toe. The right side shows the reference level conversion: the pipe top is 0.40 m above the factory floor, so 0.40 is subtracted. TP#1: 23.75 m from the pipe top equals 23.35 m from the factory floor; TP#2: 23.00 equals 22.60 m. The bottom strip summarizes how to read it: find the break in the line of points, read the depth at the break, and convert the reference level before comparing with the boring results. Reading Parallel Seismic: break point = pile toe Model diagram from pile TP#1 values 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Wave arrival time at sensor (ms) ← Depth from PVC pipe top (m) Pile toe ≈ 23.75 m (from pipe top) Along pile: steep line In concrete ~4,000 m/s Below toe: slope changes Through soil ~1,500 m/s Reading every 0.5 m (sensor pulled up in water-filled pipe) Convert datum before use Factory floor ±0.00 Pipe top 0.40 Pile toe From floor = from pipe top − 0.40 Pipe top Factory floor TP#1 23.75 m → 23.35 m TP#2 23.00 m → 22.60 m 1 Find the break in the points Slope = wave velocity 2 Read depth at the break = pile toe 3 Convert datum before comparing with boring
Conceptual model diagram of a Parallel Seismic graph using the pipe distance and wave velocities for pile TP#1: the upper data points follow the wave velocity in the pile, the lower ones change slope according to the wave velocity in soil, and the change point is the pile toe (Image: SPN Soil Engineering)

← Scroll to see the full table →

Existing pile length test results (24 Sep 2026)
PilePile toe depth from PVC pipe topPile toe depth from factory floor
TP#123.75 m23.35 m
TP#223.00 m22.60 m
An SPN engineer recording sensor depths and checking signals on the Parallel Seismic unit from the back of the test vehicle inside the factory
Sensor depth is recorded alongside the signal for every blow; this data set forms the points on the time–depth graph (Image: SPN Soil Engineering)

Why Are There 2 Values, and How Important Is the Reference Level?

The PVC pipe top is 0.40 m above the factory floor, so the report gives 2 sets of values. The value for practical use is the one referenced to the factory floor, because it is the same level the designer uses, and boring BH-1 was also started from the factory floor.

A 0.40 m discrepancy looks small, but on this job the pile toes are very close to a layer boundary. If the levels are compared incorrectly, the conclusion about which layer the toe sits in could change immediately.

Another point to understand is that the reported results are "approximate depths". The resolution depends on the sensor pull-up interval (here every 0.5 m), the pipe distance and how the lines are fitted to find the break in the graph. The 2 piles in the same building differ in length by 0.75 m, which is normal for driven piles in older buildings. Testing more than 1 pile therefore helps reveal the range of actual lengths.

What Does Soil Boring BH-1 Tell Us?

Boring BH-1 found soft clay about 21.5 m thick before reaching stiff clay at a depth of 23.0 m. The hole was drilled by rotary wash boring, with undisturbed samples taken by thin-walled tube (Shelby tube) per ASTM D1587 in the soft clay and SPT per ASTM D1586 in the stiff soils, at 1.5 m intervals. The groundwater level was measured at −1.00 m. The soil layers are summarized as follows:

← Scroll to see the full table →

Soil profile from boring BH-1
Depth (m)Soil descriptionKey test values
0.00–1.50Fill materials—
1.50–23.00Very soft to medium stiff gray clay (CH)Su 0.67–2.63 t/m² · natural moisture content up to about 96%
23.00–30.45Very stiff to hard clay and sandy CLAY (CH, CL)SPT-N 20–55 blows/ft

This soil profile is the Bangkok soft clay commonly found across Samut Prakan. To learn to read a boring log fluently, see How to read a boring log and Interpreting SPT N-values

An SPN driller operating a rotary drilling rig beside a building column inside the factory, with a drilling mud tank and pump engine in front
Wash boring with soil sampling every 1.5 m to a depth of 30.45 m, about 7 m below the pile toes found, to clearly reveal the soil layers beneath the toes (Image: SPN Soil Engineering)

What Do the Two Results Show When Overlaid?

When the pile lengths are plotted on the boring log using the same reference level, it is clear that the toes of both piles (22.60–23.35 m) sit right at the layer boundary at 23.0 m. The SPT sample at 22.5 m is still medium stiff clay (N = 8), while at 24.0 m it is very stiff clay (N = 20).

Parallel Seismic results overlaid on boring log BH-1 at the factory floor reference level: the toes of piles TP#1 and TP#2 straddle the layer boundary The vertical axis is depth below the factory floor, 0 to 31 m, to scale. The left column shows the soil layers from BH-1: fill from 0 to 1.5 m; very soft to medium stiff clay (CH), Su approximately 0.67 to 2.63 t/m², to 23.0 m; and very stiff to hard sandy clay, SPT-N 20 to 55, below that. Groundwater level is 1.00 m, with existing pile TP#1 and the PVC pipe 1.20 m away, its bottom at approximately 28.75 m. The middle column is a bar chart of SPT-N with depth: N = 8 at 22.5 m, 20 at 24.0 m, 24 at 25.5 m, 26 at 27.0 m, 55 at 28.5 m and 44 at 30.0 m; the hole bottom is at 30.45 m. A red band across all columns marks the pile toe range from TP#2 at approximately 22.60 m to TP#1 at approximately 23.35 m, straddling the layer boundary at 23.0 m. The right side concludes that the pile toes sit right at the layer boundary, so the bearing capacity is sensitive to toe differences of only a few tens of centimeters. Parallel Seismic overlaid on boring log BH-1 Depth from factory floor (to scale) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 ← Depth below factory floor (m) Soil + pile Fill Very soft clay– medium stiff (CH) Su ≈ 0.67–2.63 t/m² Very stiff–hard clay Sandy CLAY · N 20–55 Existing pile TP#1 PVC pipe 1.20 away Pipe base ≈ 28.75 ▽ −1.00 SPT-N (BH-1) · blows/30 cm 0 20 40 60 8 20 24 26 55 44 EOH 30.45 m N data at layer boundary Pile toe vs soil TP#1 ≈ 23.35 m TP#2 ≈ 22.60 m Boundary ≈ 23.0 m SPT-N 8 → 20 (22.5 → 24.0 m) Pile toe sits right at the layer boundary so capacity is sensitive to toe differences of only a few tens of cm Red band = pile toe range TP#2 (22.60) to TP#1 (23.35) · horizontal not to scale
Pile lengths from Parallel Seismic overlaid on the soil layers from BH-1 at the factory floor reference level: the red band is the toe range of TP#1 and TP#2, which straddles the boundary between the soft clay and the stiff clay (Image: SPN Soil Engineering). The middle bar chart shows the SPT-N values of BH-1 with depth.

This conclusion matters to the designer, because pile toe resistance depends on the soil layer the toe rests in. A pile whose toe reaches the stiff layer and one whose toe is still in medium stiff clay may have clearly different capacities, even though their lengths differ by less than 1 m.

This data set is the starting input for the design engineer's further assessment, for example choosing conservative values for piles whose toes have not reached the stiff layer, or considering whether more data are needed. Deciding how much new load the existing foundation can carry, and whether foundation strengthening is required, is a matter for the judgment of the engineer responsible for the project.

💡 What Parallel Seismic can and cannot tell you

Parallel Seismic mainly tells you the "length" of a pile. It does not tell you the load capacity, cross-section size or integrity of the pile shaft. To find those out, other methods are needed, such as exposing the pile head or a Seismic Integrity Test where the pile head is accessible.

Lessons from This Job for Anyone Renovating an Existing Building

This job offers 5 lessons for gathering existing foundation data before renovating a building:

  • Always pair Parallel Seismic with soil boring — pile length alone does not tell you what the toe rests on
  • Drill the boring deeper than the expected pile toe — this job drilled to 30.45 m, revealing both the layer boundary and the stiff layer below
  • Install pipes several meters below the pile toe, straight, parallel and no more than about 2.5 m from the pile
  • Use one reference level for all data — the pipe top, building floor and borehole collar must be converted to the same level before comparison
  • Test more than 1 pile — piles in the same building can differ in length; on this job by 0.75 m

If you are planning to inspect an old building before renovation or extension, see the overview in Old buildings before extension: what structural checks are needed?, or see SPN's non-destructive structural testing (NDE) and soil investigation services

Fees for Parallel Seismic and soil boring depend on the number of piles, the pipe and borehole depths, and working conditions inside the building, so they are estimated per project. Request a free quotation within 24 hours on the SPN contact page. Prices exclude travel and equipment mobilization costs, which are charged according to the distance to the site.

⚠️ Note on the case study data

The figures and photos in this article come from an actual SPN test job, without naming the building owner. The Parallel Seismic graph and sections in the article are conceptual model diagrams created from the project values, not the original graphs, and the conclusions in the article are explanatory, not foundation design results.