This article is a field guide, not theory. To understand what the test measures and how it is calculated, read What Is a Plate Bearing Test? Principles and Calculation. To find out which projects are legally required to perform it, read When Is a Plate Bearing Test Legally Required? The 200 kPa Criterion

How Do You Prepare a Site for a Plate Bearing Test?

Site preparation responsibilities are split fairly clearly between the contractor and the test team. The contractor handles earthworks, machinery and site access, while the test team handles the measuring instruments and load control. The table below is a checklist both sides can agree on before booking the test date.

← Scroll to see the full table →

Table 1: Plate Bearing Test site preparation checklist and responsibilities
Item to prepareResponsible partyAcceptance criteria
Excavate the test pitContractorDown to the design foundation base level; pit bottom level and undisturbed
Reaction loadContractorBackhoe/excavator or kentledge providing reaction at least 1.2 times the maximum test load
Working area around the test pointContractorClear a radius of about 3–4 m so the reference beams and supports can be set up without hitting the machine
Site accessContractorA pickup or small truck can reach the test point without getting bogged down or blocked by ditches
Drainage around the pitContractorNo standing water at the pit bottom; drainage channels or a tarpaulin cover when work stops
Test point layout and levelsSite supervisor / design engineerSpecify point coordinates, foundation base level and target stress (kPa) in advance
Test plate, jack, load cell, gaugesTest teamCalibrated, with certificates attached to the report
Load control and data recordingTest teamCarried out in accordance with DPT standard 1253-62 and ASTM D1195/D1196
Plate Bearing Test setup installed under a backhoe used as the reaction load, with hydraulic jack, reference beams and load readout, at an actual SPN site
Test setup installed under a backhoe used as the reaction load — the jack sits under the machine's center of gravity, with reference beams placed parallel on both sides of the test plate (actual site photo, Chon Buri: SPN Soil Engineering)

The layout below combines every item in the table into a single drawing. Use it on site to agree where space must be left, how to position the excavator and where water must drain before the test date.

Plan view of the site layout around a Plate Bearing Test point that the contractor must prepare before the test team arrives Plan view, not to scale. A rectangular test pit is excavated to the design foundation base level; hatching around the edge shows the pit side slopes. The pit bottom width is at least 4 times the test plate size. On the right, a ramp connects to the pickup access route to the test point. In the center of the pit is a test plate of size D with the jack and load cell at its center. The excavator's two tracks straddle the plate with the machine's center of gravity aligned with the jack. The excavator serves as the reaction load, which must be at least 1.2 times the maximum test load. Two reference beams run parallel to the tracks; all four beam supports are outside the plate's zone of influence, at least a distance S from the plate edge and from the tracks, where S is 2.4 m or 2.5 times the plate radius, whichever is greater. Two to four settlement gauges around the plate read to 0.01 mm. An umbrella or tarpaulin shades the reference beams. The dashed circle is the cleared area with a radius of about 3 to 4 m. Drainage channels around the pit edge flow to a sump at the pit corner to keep water out of the pit. The bottom strip summarizes items one to eight. Testing is carried out in accordance with DPT 1253-62 and ASTM D1195/D1196. 2D plan view: site layout around a Plate Bearing test point Not to scale S ≥ S Pit bottom width ≥ 4 × plate size (D) Machine CG ↔ jack axis Clear radius ≈ 3–4 m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sump + pump-out 8 Pickup access to test point S = beam support distance ≥ 2.4 m or ≥ 2.5 × plate radius (greater value) from plate edge and from supports/tracks, all legs Plate influence zone (edge + S) Reaction load ≥ 1.2 × max. test load Jack under machine CG, no offset Tested to DPT 1253-62 · ASTM D1195/D1196 1 Test pit To design foundation level 2 Test plate, size D Jack + load cell at center 3 Excavator tracks Straddle test point 4 2 reference beams 4 supports outside zone 5 2–4 gauges Reads to 0.01 mm 6 Shade the beams Umbrella/tarp, whole test 7 Drainage channel To sump, not into pit 8 Pickup access To test point, no mud
Plan view of the site layout around a Plate Bearing Test point — the excavator straddles the point so the jack sits under its center of gravity; the two reference beams have their supports outside the zone of influence, at least S from the plate edge and the tracks; plus drainage channels, shading and vehicle access to the test point (diagram: SPN Soil Engineering)

What Is the Reaction Load and How Large Must It Be?

The reaction load is the weight that resists the thrust of the hydraulic jack while it presses the test plate into the soil. The jack needs something to "push up" against before it can push down. If the reaction load is too small, the machine will be lifted off the ground before the soil reaches the target load, and the test will stop midway.

The approach is to calculate the required maximum test load first, then provide a reaction load at least 1.2 times that value.

Maximum test load (kN) = target stress (kPa) × test plate area (m²) Testing typically goes to about 2 times the design stress, e.g. a design of 200 kPa is tested to 400 kPa

Using a backhoe as the reaction load

In Thailand, the most common method is to have a backhoe or excavator already on site straddle the test point, with the jack placed under its belly. This is faster and cheaper than stacking kentledge, but three conditions must all be met.

  • Position — the machine must straddle the test point so the jack sits under its center of gravity, not offset to either side; otherwise the machine will tilt or lift on one side
  • Underbody clearance — there must be enough height to fit the test plate, jack, load cell and reference beams, while still leaving room for a person to read and adjust the gauges
  • Load actually transferred to the jack — always less than the machine's own weight, because part of it still goes to the tracks; allow a margin above the figure calculated from machine weight alone

The table below gives the load required for each test plate size, so you can roughly judge whether the machinery on site is sufficient (assuming testing to 400 kPa, i.e. 2 times a design stress of 200 kPa).

← Scroll to see the full table →

Table 2: Test load and reaction load to prepare, by test plate size
Plate sizeAreaLoad at 200 kPaLoad at 400 kPaMin. reaction load (1.2×)
Ø 300 mm0.071 m²14.1 kN ≈ 1.4 t28.3 kN ≈ 2.9 t≈ 3.5 t
Ø 450 mm0.159 m²31.8 kN ≈ 3.2 t63.6 kN ≈ 6.5 t≈ 7.8 t
Ø 600 mm0.283 m²56.5 kN ≈ 5.8 t113 kN ≈ 11.5 t≈ 13.8 t
Ø 750 mm0.442 m²88.4 kN ≈ 9.0 t177 kN ≈ 18.0 t≈ 21.6 t

Note: The figures above are preliminary estimates for equipment planning only. The actual target stress, plate size and test termination criteria must be set by the design engineer and the engineer supervising the test.

📌 How to read this table

The larger the plate, the more reaction load is needed — and it rises steeply: from Ø 300 mm, where a small backhoe is enough, to Ø 750 mm, which needs a medium-to-large excavator. Plate size therefore has to be agreed at the planning stage, not decided on site.

Crawler excavator straddling a Plate Bearing Test point as the reaction load, with an umbrella shading the measuring equipment, at an actual SPN site
Excavator straddling the test point as the reaction load, with an umbrella shading the measuring equipment throughout the test (actual site photo, Chon Buri: SPN Soil Engineering)

Kentledge and ground anchors

When there is no sufficiently large machine on site, or the test point cannot be reached by vehicle, the options are:

  • Kentledge — concrete blocks, steel plates or sandbags stacked on a steel frame spanning the test point. The advantage is a precisely controlled load; the drawbacks are the time needed to transport and stack it and the large footprint required
  • Ground anchors (Anchor / Reaction Pile) — the reaction beam is tied to anchors or piles installed around the test point. Suitable for very high test loads or confined sites, but must be designed and installed in advance
⚠️ Reaction system safety

The reaction system is the highest-risk part of the test. Kentledge stacks must be stable and must not topple, supports must stand on ground that can carry the load, and nobody may stand beneath the load while it is being applied. If the machine starts to tilt or lift, stop and release the pressure immediately.

Hydraulic jack and readout installed under a crawler excavator used as the reaction load in a Plate Bearing Test, with a sign showing the project and test date, at an industrial estate site in Rayong
Jack and readout positioned exactly under the machine's center of gravity — note the sign showing the project, location, point number and test date, which must appear in the photo of every point for reference in the report (actual site photo, industrial estate, Rayong: SPN Soil Engineering)

Excavating the Test Pit Correctly — How Deep and How Wide?

The most common site mistake is testing at the wrong level. The result then reflects a different soil layer from the one the foundation will actually bear on, and cannot be used to verify the design at all.

  • Level — excavate down to the design foundation base level; do not test on the original ground surface, temporary fill, or fill not yet compacted to specification
  • Pit width — typically open the pit to at least 4 times the test plate size, so the pit walls do not confine soil movement, which would make the result higher than reality
  • Pit bottom surface — level and smooth it. If the surface is rough, spread a thin layer of fine sand to level only the plate seating area — do not place thick sand, or you end up testing the sand
  • Timing — excavate as close to the test date as possible. A pit bottom left open for several days will dry and crack, or become saturated when it rains; either way the results are distorted

Before the scheduled date, compare the actual site with the drawing below. If the pit still lacks any of these seven items, fix it before calling in the test team.

3D model of a Plate Bearing test pit prepared by the contractor before the test team arrives on site Conceptual 3D view of a soil block with a rectangular test pit, with the front face cut through the pit to show it has been excavated to the design foundation base level, not the original ground surface. The pit bottom is in the soil layer the foundation will actually bear on. The pit bottom is smooth, with a thin layer of leveling sand only at the plate seating area and a red marker for the plate position at the center. The green dashed line on the pit bottom marks the cleared area with a radius of about 3 to 4 m around the test point. On the ground surface around the pit, drainage channels flow to a sump at the pit corner, with a pump and hose discharging water off site. Beside the pit is a tarpaulin roll for covering the pit when work stops, partly pulled over the pit edge. A reference benchmark is outside the pit. A sign showing the project, test point and date stands beside the pit so it appears in photos. On the right, a ramp connects to the pickup access route to the test point, with a culvert under the road for the drainage channel. The red box at the bottom warns against testing over standing water — pump it out and let the soil recover — and against testing on fill not yet compacted to specification. The right-hand box is a seven-item checklist matching the numbers in the drawing, and reminds you to excavate the pit as close to the test date as possible. 3D model: test pit ready before the test team arrives Not to scale 4 Tarp cover when idle Benchmark 3 Drain channel → sump Pump out, no water in pit 6 Pickup access to test point 1 To foundation base design level, not grade 2 Thin leveling sand at plate seat only 5 7 Project/point/date sign in every photo NO Testing in water Pump out, let soil recover Uncompacted fill Compact to spec first Checklist before team arrives 1 Foundation base level Dig to design level per benchmark 2 Level + thin sand Sand at plate seat only, not thick 3 Drainage / sump Channel around pit, no ponding 4 Tarpaulin Cover pit when idle/raining 5 Clear 3–4 m area around point for ref. beams 6 Access road Pickup reaches point, no mud 7 Test point sign Project · point · date in photo Dig close to test date Base not cracked/rain-soaked
A test pit ready for the test team — excavated to the design foundation base level, with a smooth pit bottom and thin sand only at the plate seat, drainage channels to a sump, a tarpaulin cover, a test point sign and pickup access (diagram: SPN Soil Engineering)
Plate Bearing Test setup fully installed in a test pit excavated to foundation base level, with reference beams and reaction system, by the SPN engineering team
Test setup fully installed in a pit excavated to foundation base level — the pit is wide enough for the reference beam supports to sit outside the plate's zone of influence (actual site photo: SPN Soil Engineering)
Vibratory roller compacting the bottom of a test pit excavated to foundation base level, before installing a Plate Bearing Test setup on a compacted fill layer
Where the foundation bears on a compacted fill layer, the fill must be compacted to the specified density and pass a Field Density Test before testing on that surface — but if the foundation is designed to bear on natural ground, never compact or place fill over the test surface (actual site photo: SPN Soil Engineering)

How Far Away Must the Reference Beams and Gauges Be?

The reference beam is the beam used as a fixed datum for measuring plate settlement. There is only one principle: the beam supports must be outside the zone where the soil moves. If the supports sink along with the plate, the settlement readings will be smaller than reality and the whole curve will be wrong.

  • Support distance — typically at least about 2.5 times the plate radius, or at least 2.4 m, whichever is greater, from the plate edge and from the reaction supports
  • Number of gauges — install 2–4 settlement gauges (dial gauges or LVDTs) around the plate and average the readings to cancel out errors from plate tilt
  • Resolution — gauges should read to 0.01 mm, because the reference settlement for determining the k value is only 1.25 mm
  • Shading — cover the reference beams with an umbrella or tarpaulin throughout the test. Steel in direct sun expands and makes the readings drift continuously even though the soil has not settled further
Plate Bearing Test setup diagram showing the hydraulic jack, ball joint, steel bearing plate, reference beam and settlement gauges
Setup diagram — the jack transfers load through a ball joint to the steel plate, with settlement gauges mounted on a reference beam whose supports are outside the zone of influence on both sides

Load measurement is just as important. Sites that read only the jack's pressure gauge are prone to errors from friction inside the cylinder. Using a load cell between the jack and the plate, read through a digital readout, gives the actual load transferred to the soil, traceable to the calibration certificate.

Dial gauge with 0.01 mm resolution and 30 mm travel mounted on a reference beam to measure test plate settlement in a Plate Bearing Test
Dial gauge with 0.01 mm resolution and 30 mm travel, mounted on a magnetic base on the reference beam with its stem touching the test plate — set the initial position so enough travel remains for the whole test (actual site photo: SPN Soil Engineering)
High-resolution load cell connected to the hydraulic jack in a Plate Bearing Test, with two settlement gauges on the reference beam and a load readout
Load cell between the jack and the test plate, with two settlement gauges on the reference beam — measuring the actual load instead of relying on the pressure gauge alone (actual site photo: SPN Soil Engineering)

Weather and Timing — How Should You Plan the Test Day?

A Plate Bearing Test is carried out outdoors in an open pit, so rain directly affects the result. Water ponding at the pit bottom saturates the soil and temporarily reduces its bearing capacity, so the measured value will not represent the foundation's actual service condition.

  • Prepare drainage channels around the pit and cover it with a tarpaulin when work stops
  • If water ponds at the pit bottom, pump it out and let the soil recover, or postpone the test — never test over water
  • Setting up and testing one point typically takes about half a day to one day, depending on how difficult the reaction load is to set up and the number of load increments
  • The engineer-certified report is typically completed within 7–14 working days after fieldwork ends

Which Site Mistakes Make Test Results Unusable? (7 Mistakes)

These mistakes come up again and again, and almost all of them can be prevented before the test team arrives on site.

  1. Testing at the wrong level — not excavating to foundation base level, or testing on fill not yet compacted to specification; the result belongs to a different soil layer
  2. Uneven pit bottom — the plate does not seat fully and only touches at certain points; the plate tilts and the early part of the curve is distorted
  3. Insufficient reaction load — the machine is lifted before the target load is reached; the test must be terminated midway and repeated
  4. Reference beam supports too close — the supports are within the moving soil zone or close to the reaction supports, so measured settlement is less than the actual value
  5. Reference beams not shaded — the steel expands from heat and readings keep drifting even after the soil has stopped settling
  6. Water in the pit — the soil is saturated and temporarily weaker, giving results lower than reality
  7. Reading load from the pressure gauge only — with no load cell to cross-check, the actual load applied to the soil may differ from what is recorded
🚫 A retest costs more than you think

When a test result is unusable, the cost is not just a second round of testing. It also includes foundation work stopped while waiting for results, remobilizing the machinery and time lost along the construction schedule. Spending an extra half day on site preparation is always worth it.

What Information Should You Send the Test Team in Advance?

Information sent in advance lets the test team choose the plate size and reaction system and prepare the right equipment from the start, reducing the chance of having to go back for more equipment.

  • Test point layout with coordinates, and the number of points required
  • Design foundation base level (referenced to the project's construction datum)
  • Target stress to be verified (kPa) and test termination criteria per the project specification
  • Boring log or the project's soil investigation report, if available
  • Type and size of machinery available on site, to assess whether it can serve as the reaction load
  • Project safety requirements, such as site induction training or permit-to-work documents

If there is no subsoil information for the site at all, consider soil investigation as well, because a Plate Bearing Test only checks the shallow soil beneath the plate. If a weak layer is hidden deeper down, the results will look better than they really are — this is explained in the article Soil bearing capacity

What Should You Prepare Before Test Day, in Order?

Here is everything in this article arranged as a three-stage work sequence that site supervisors can easily follow.

  1. When booking the test date — send the test point layout, foundation base level, target stress (kPa) and the type of machinery on site to the test team, so they can choose the plate size and a reaction system providing at least 1.2 times the maximum test load
  2. Before test day (as close to it as possible) — excavate the pit to foundation base level, level the surface, dig drainage channels and prepare a tarpaulin cover, clear an area of about 3–4 m around the point, and check that a pickup can reach the test point
  3. Morning of the test — pump out any ponded water, check that the pit bottom is neither dry and cracked nor saturated, move the reaction machine into position with the jack under its center of gravity, then let the test team set up the reference beams outside the zone of influence with shading

Summary

Plate Bearing Test site preparation comes down to four main points: excavate the pit to the actual foundation base level and level the surface, provide a reaction load at least 1.2 times the maximum test load, leave room to set the reference beams outside the zone of influence and keep them shaded, and send the point layout, levels and target stress to the test team in advance

All of this takes only a few days of advance planning, yet removes almost all of the risk of unusable test results. For the legal requirements on whether your project must perform a Plate Bearing Test, see the article The 200 kPa criterion under the foundation Ministerial Regulation, and for an overview of foundation requirements, see Summary of the Foundation Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2566 (2023)

📌 Note

This article is provided as engineering knowledge. The distances, reaction loads and criteria are preliminary guidance for site planning. Selection of plate size, target stress and interpretation of results for design should be at the discretion of a licensed engineer and in accordance with DPT 1253-62 and the relevant ASTM standards.