Disputes with adjacent buildings are among the most expensive risks of urban construction, because they can stop work immediately even when the actual damage is small. The root cause is usually not proving who is at fault, but that nobody has evidence of what the building looked like before work started. This article summarizes what to record, how to make a crack map and install monitoring instruments, how far out to survey, and what kind of report actually holds up in negotiations.
What is a dilapidation survey, and when is it done?
A dilapidation survey is the inspection and recording of the existing damage to adjacent buildings as evidence, before starting construction activities that may cause vibration or ground movement. In Thailand it is often called an "adjacent building condition survey" or a "pre-piling condition inspection" — they are the same job.
The right time is before heavy machinery enters the site, not after two or three piles have already been driven, because evidence collected after work has started can immediately be challenged on the grounds that the cracks may have been caused by the early works.
Five groups of activities should always be preceded by a survey, because they can move the surrounding ground even with good site control:
- Pile driving
- Large-diameter bored piling
- Deep excavation and retaining wall works
- Building demolition
- Works requiring groundwater lowering (dewatering)
Why do it when the law does not directly require it?
Because when a claim arises, the party without evidence of the prior condition can hardly tell which cracks are old and which are new. Legally, liability for construction that damages another person's property falls under tort law in Section 420 of the Thai Civil and Commercial Code, under which the injured party must prove that damage actually occurred and was caused by the other party's actions.
In practice, however, when cracks appear in a neighboring house while piles are being driven right outside, everyone's opinion immediately leans the same way. The usual result is a work stoppage for negotiations, and a payment to get work moving again.
An adjacent building survey report does not prevent damage, but it makes the scope of liability clear. The construction side is liable only for what actually got worse, and the owner of the adjacent building is compensated for the damage that actually occurred — which is why negotiations end much faster than arguing on feelings.
What must an adjacent building survey report record?
A usable report must answer 3 questions: which building was surveyed, what its condition was on that day, and when it was surveyed. The required elements can be summarized in 7 items, as shown in the table.
← Scroll to see the full table →
| Topic | What to record |
|---|---|
| Building information | Address, owner or occupant, number of stories, structural system as far as can be observed, distance from the construction line |
| Photographs | Overall views of all 4 sides, close-ups of every crack with a ruler or scale in the frame, and the date embedded in the image file |
| Walk-through video | Continuous, unedited footage walking around the building and through accessible rooms, confirming that the record is not limited to hand-picked spots |
| Crack location plan (Crack Map) | Location, direction, length and width of each crack, with reference numbers matching the photographs |
| Tilt and settlement | Plumbness of walls or columns, floor level differences, gaps between floor and wall, doors and windows that do not close properly |
| Services and building elements | Cracked tiles, leaks, water pipes and gutters with existing defects, fences and walkways around the building |
| Sign-off | Survey date, name and signature of the surveyor and, where possible, a joint acknowledgment signed by the owner of the adjacent building |
The last item is often overlooked. Having the adjacent building owner sign an acknowledgment of the survey turns the report from "a document the contractor made on its own" into "a document both parties are aware of" — which carries very different weight at the negotiating table.
How are a crack map and crack gauges done?
A crack map is a plan showing the location and size of every crack in the building on the survey date, while a crack gauge is an instrument fixed across a crack to read changes in its width over time. The first answers "what was there on that day"; the second answers "is that crack still moving". These are different questions, and the two must be used together.
A practical way to make a crack map is to write a reference number next to each crack on the wall in pencil or with a sticker, photograph it so that the number and a measuring scale are in the same frame, and then record the width with a crack width gauge card. Numbering the cracks makes it possible to re-photograph exactly the same spot in the next round.
A plate-type (tell-tale) crack gauge is fixed to the wall on both sides of the crack, and the movement of its scale is read at set intervals, e.g. weekly during pile driving. A steady reading means an old crack that has stopped moving; a continuously increasing reading is a signal that the project's responsible engineer must be notified immediately.
How far out should buildings be surveyed?
There is no single radius that works for every project. The extent depends on the type of activity, the energy put into the ground, the depth of excavation, the local soil layers, and the vulnerability of the adjacent buildings themselves. Old buildings on shallow foundations on soft soil are affected at greater distances than new buildings on deep piles.
The approach used in practice is to start with every building on the property line, then extend coverage to buildings within approximately 30–50 meters of the pile driving line or the excavation edge, and then adjust the extent to actual conditions — for example, an old or heritage building further away should also be included.
The distances above are only a starting point for planning, not a criterion that replaces project-specific assessment. The actual survey extent should be set by the responsible engineer, taking into account the soil profile from the project's soil investigation report.
What else must be monitored during construction?
During construction, 3 additional layers must be monitored: crack gauge readings, vibration, and movement of the ground and structures, because the pre-construction survey is only the first reference point.
- Read crack gauges at set intervals — keep a log of dates and readings, with photographs every time, so the trend is visible rather than just the final value.
- Vibration monitoring — measure peak particle velocity at adjacent buildings during pile driving to check whether vibration levels are within the reference criteria. For measurement methods and reference criteria such as DIN 4150-3 and BS 7385-2, see Pile Driving Cracked the House Next Door? Vibration Monitoring
- Monitor ground and structural movement — for deep excavations or retaining wall works, install instruments such as settlement points or inclinometers; see the Geotechnical Instrumentation page for guidance. To turn settlement and tilt of adjacent buildings into numbers that can be compared with alert levels, read how to select and place measurement points in Settlement Points and Tiltmeters: Measuring Settlement and Tilt of Adjacent Buildings
These three layers complement each other. Vibration readings tell you "how strong the loading is", crack gauge readings tell you "how the building is responding", and movement instruments tell you "how far the ground and structure have moved". Having all three makes it possible to explain events in sequence instead of guessing after the fact.
How is this documentation used when a dispute arises?
As "before–after" comparison images of the same spot, to separate existing cracks from new ones. The steps that resolve the matter quickly almost always follow the same sequence:
- Respond and visit the site immediately — look at the location of the complaint first; do not deny before looking.
- Open the original survey report — compare photographs of the same spot by crack number.
- Record the current condition — take a new set of photographs and width measurements that day.
- Agree on the findings together — if it is an existing crack, show the dated comparison images directly to the building owner. If it is a new crack or an existing crack that has widened, have an engineer assess whether it affects structural stability or is only cosmetic damage, and then decide on the repair approach and who is responsible.
Where cracks are in worrying locations such as columns, beams or load-bearing walls, further in-depth non-destructive testing should be carried out to see whether the concrete and reinforcement are affected. For suitable methods in this case, see the NDT guide for non-destructive testing of concrete structures, and if the adjacent building is an old building with pre-existing problems, read the assessment approach in Before Extending an Old Building: What Structural Checks Are Needed
Photographs with the date embedded in the file · a measuring scale visible in close-ups · crack reference numbers that match between the map and the photos · the surveyor's signature · and, where possible, an acknowledgment signed by the owner of the adjacent building. These elements make the document much harder to challenge.
Summary
Surveying adjacent buildings before construction is low-cost paperwork compared with the risk it prevents. The key is to do it before real work starts, photograph every side, make a crack map with reference numbers, and install instruments at locations of concern to see the trend along the way.
When a claim comes in, what settles it is not insisting that "we did the work correctly", but comparison images that both parties look at and agree on what has changed. Vibration monitoring alongside helps show that construction really stayed within controlled levels. To plan a survey and instrumentation for your project, contact us for a free quotation within 24 hours.
This content summarizes practice for general understanding only. It is not legal advice and not a project-specific plan. The survey extent, vibration control criteria and damage assessment must be set by the project's responsible engineer, and questions of liability and damage claims should be discussed with your legal advisor.